Thrombolytic therapy: The treatment of choice in acute myocardial infarction

被引:1
作者
Guzman L.A. [1 ]
Lincoff A.M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
[2] Department of Cardiology, Desk F-25, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195
关键词
Public Health; Myocardial Infarction; Acute Myocardial Infarction; Thrombolytic Therapy;
D O I
10.1023/A:1008889030954
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The benefits in thrombolytic therapy have been unequivocally demonstrated by several major trials, with an overall decrease in mortality of 27% when these agents are administered during the first 6 hours of symptom onset. Although significant limitations in current regimens exist, thrombolytic therapy continues to be the treatment of choice in the vast majority of patients. Primary PTCA may be the preferred strategy in a select group of patients, given the availability of experienced operators and provided that initiation of mechanical reperfusion is not delayed. The field of treatment of AMI is rapidly evolving. The pharmacologic approach continues to improve with the development of new generations of thrombolytic agents and the addition of adjunctive therapies such as the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists. The mechanical approach also is under rapid evolution, with the use of stents to limit reocclusion and long-term restenosis, as well as the adjunctive use of pharmacologic agents. Irrespective of which strategy is used in the treatment of an evolving myocardial infarction, early restoration of complete infarct artery perfusion should be the essential therapeutic goal.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 343
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Vital Statistics of the United States, 1988, 2, PART A, (1991)
[2]  
De Wood M.A., Spores J., Notske R., Et al., Prevalence of total coronary occlusion during the early hours of transmural myocardial infarction, N Engl J Med, 303, pp. 897-902, (1980)
[3]  
Chazov E.L., Mateeva L.S., Mazaev A.V., Sargin K.E., Sadovskaia G.V., Intracoronary administration of fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction, Ter Arkh, 48, pp. 8-19, (1976)
[4]  
Rentrop K.T., Blanke H., Karsch K.R., Kreuzer H., Initial experience with transluminal recanalization of the recently occluded infarct-related artery in acute myocardial infarction: Comparison with conventionally treated patients, Clin Cardiol, 2, pp. 92-105, (1979)
[5]  
Kennedy J.W., Ritchie J.L., Davis K.B., Fritz J.K., Western Washington trial of intracoronary streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction, N Engl J Med, pp. 1477-1482, (1983)
[6]  
Indications for fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction: Collaborative overview of early mortality and major morbidity results from all randomized trials of more than 1000 patients, Lancet, 343, pp. 311-322, (1994)
[7]  
Late Assessment of Thrombolytic Efficacy (LATE) study with alteplase 6-24 hours after onset of acute myocardial infarction, Lancet, 342, pp. 759-766, (1993)
[8]  
Randomized trial of late thrombolysis in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction, Lancet, 342, pp. 767-772, (1993)
[9]  
Van De Werf F., Thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction. Why is there no extra benefit after hospital discharge?, Circulation, 91, pp. 2862-2864, (1995)
[10]  
Chesebro J.H., Knatterud G., Roberts R., Et al., Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial, Phase I: A comparison between intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and intravenous streptokinase, Circulation, 76, pp. 142-154, (1987)