Effect of Solution Heat Treatment (Temperature and Time) on Microstructure and Properties of Al–Cu–Mg Alloy

被引:0
作者
Nikunj Patel
Mohit Joshi
Abhishek Singh
Gaurav Nandkishore Mittal
Mitushi Agrawal
Sunil Manani
Ajaya Kumar Pradhan
机构
[1] MNIT Jaipur,Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering
来源
International Journal of Metalcasting | 2024年 / 18卷
关键词
Al; Cu; Mg alloy; aluminum alloy; solution heat treatment; compression test;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This research paper examines the effect of different solution heat treatments parameters (temperature and time) on Al–3.39%Cu–2.26%Mg (wt%) alloy’s microstructure, thermal, mechanical and corrosion properties. 5754 alloy and Al–Cu alloy are used to make Al–3.39%Cu–2.26%Mg (wt%) by gravity die casting. Solution heat treatment at different temperature and time (500 °C-10 min, 500 °C-4h, 530 °C-10 min and 530 °C-2h). As-cast Al–Cu–Mg alloy have α-phase and eutectic phase. After solution heat treatment and aging, precipitates phases is observed in microstructure. X-ray diffraction analysis results have shown that a precipitate phase [S phase (Al2CuMg)] gets formed in as-cast conditions but undergoes dissolution during the solution heat treatment process. As-cast Al–Cu–Mg alloy has a Brinell hardness value of 77.2 HB. As-cast alloy has S (Al2CuMg) precipitate phase increases hardness by precipitation strengthening. After solution heat treatment and aging, Brinell hardness reduces. After solution heat treatment (500 °C for 4 h) and aging (200 °C for 5 h), Brinell hardness values becomes 63.6 HB (− 17.6% decrease). Corrosion resistance improves after the solution heat treatment due to the dissolution of the precipitate phase, forming an almost single-phase solid solution. The as-cast alloy exhibits a peak compressive stress of 494.2 MPa, which increases after solution heat treatment and water quenching to 572.7 MPa (without aging). After aging, peak compressive stress decreases to 508.4 MPa. Failure strain for the as-cast alloy is 39.6%, reducing to 31.1% after solution heat treatment and water quenching. It again increases to 43.1% after aging.
引用
收藏
页码:1151 / 1159
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Özbek İ(2007)A study on the resolution heat treatment of AA 2618 Aluminum alloy Mater. Charact. 58 312-317
[2]  
Jang J(2013)Effect of solution treatment and artificial aging on microstructure and mechanical properties of Al–Cu alloy Trans. Nonferr. Met. Soc. China 23 631-635
[3]  
Xu Y(2017)Experimental research on creep aging behavior of Al–Cu–Mg alloy with tensile and compressive stresses Mater. Sci. Eng. A 682 54-62
[4]  
Bo G(2020)Static softening behavior and modeling of an Al–Cu–Mg–Zr alloy with various pre-precipitation microstructures during multistage hot deformation Mater. Sci. Eng. A 778 139094-3440
[5]  
Zamani M(2020)Optimisation of heat treatment of Al–Cu–(Mg–Ag) cast alloys J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 139 3427-62
[6]  
Toschi S(2016)Characterisation of precipitation upon cooling of an AA2618 Al–Cu–Mg alloy J. Alloys Compd. 654 56-941
[7]  
Morri A(2007)Two types of S phase precipitates in Al–Cu–Mg alloys Acta Mater. 55 933-350
[8]  
Chobaut N(2014)A preliminary study on optimizing the heat treatment of high strength Al–Cu–Mg–Zn alloys Mater. Des. 57 342-119
[9]  
Wang SC(2018)Aging behavior of an Al–Cu–Mg alloy J. Alloys Compd. 759 108-635
[10]  
Starinks MJ(2013)Effect of solution treatment and artificial aging on microstructure and mechanical properties of Al–Cu alloy Trans. Nonferr. Met. Soc. China 23 631-94