Can diagnostic self-testing of laypeople be predicted by core concepts of health behaviour theories? A comparison between German self-testers and non-self-testers

被引:1
作者
Kuecuekbalaban P. [1 ]
Muehlan H. [1 ]
Schmidt S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Health and Prevention, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University Greifswald, Robert-Blum-Str. 13, Greifswald
关键词
Health behaviour (theories); Representative survey; Self-diagnosis; Self-management; Self-testing;
D O I
10.1007/s10389-016-0746-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Aim: A broad range of self-tests (testing for e.g. HIV, cancer, hepatitis B/C) is available on the Internet and can be conducted by lay consumers without the help of a health professional. However, little is known about the determinants of self-testing. The aims of this study were to investigate whether the use of self-tests can be predicted by (1) factors specified in social-cognitive health behaviour theories; (2) technological affinity; or (3) anticipated affect. Subjects and methods: An online survey was conducted to investigate social-cognitive health concepts, technological affinity, and anticipated affect as predictors of self-testing. Participants were invited in batches, representative of the age and gender distribution in Germany, until similar numbers of completed cases of non-self-testers (n = 512) and self-testers (n = 505) were reached. Univariate and multiple hierarchical logistic regression analyses were carried out. Results: Self-testing was significantly associated with self-test-related self-efficacy, perceived severity, perceived susceptibility, and to some degree with outcome expectancy. Technological competence acted as a suppressor variable, tending to enhance the predictive value of self-test-related self-efficacy. Participants who anticipated a positive self-test-related affect were more likely to be self-testers than non-self-testers. Conclusions: Self-testing was predicted by the common health psychological constructs. However, including technological affinity and anticipated affect into the model significantly improved the predictive value of the use of self-tests. Given the current shortage of physicians, especially in rural areas, the need for, and actual use of self-tests could increase in Germany in the future. Thus, follow-up studies investigating the emotional consequences of self-testing are needed. © 2016, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 487
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Ajzen I., The theory of planned behavior, Organ Behav Hum Decis Process, 50, pp. 179-211, (1991)
[2]  
Ajzen I., The theory of planned behaviour: reactions and reflections, Psychol Health, 26, pp. 1113-1127, (2011)
[3]  
Becker M.H., The health belief model and personal health behavior, (1974)
[4]  
Beierlein C., Kovaleva A., Kemper C.J., Rammstedt B., Ein Messinstrument zur Erfassung subjektiver Kompetenzerwartungen: Allgemeine Selbstwirksamkeit Kurzskala (ASKU) [Short scale for measuring general self-efficacy beliefs (ASKU)], GESIS, (2012)
[5]  
Conner M., Armitage C.J., Extending the theory of planned behavior: a review and avenues for further research, J Appl Soc Psychol, 28, pp. 1429-1464, (1998)
[6]  
Dunlap W.P., Kemery E.R., Failure to detect moderating effects: is multicollinearity the problem?, Psychol Bull, 102, pp. 418-420, (1987)
[7]  
Grispen J., Ronda G., Dinant G.-J., de Vries N., van der Weijden T., To test or not to test: a cross-sectional survey of the psychosocial determinants of self-testing for cholesterol, glucose, and HIV, BMC Public Health, 11, (2011)
[8]  
Grispen J., Ickenroth M.H.P., de Vries N.K., van der Weijden T., Ronda G., Quality and use of consumer information provided with home test kits: room for improvement. Health Expectations, doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00805.x, (2012)
[9]  
IBM SPSS statistics for Windows, version 22.0, IBM, (2013)
[10]  
Ickenroth M.H.P., Ronda G., Grispen J.E.J., Dinant G.-J., de Vries N., van der Weijden T., How do people respond to self-test results? A cross-sectional survey, BioMed Cent Fam Prac, 11, (2010)