Efficacy and tolerability of Z-drug adjunction to antidepressant treatment for major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:0
作者
Taro Kishi
Shinji Matsunaga
Nakao Iwata
机构
[1] Fujita Health University School of Medicine,Department of Psychiatry
来源
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience | 2017年 / 267卷
关键词
Z-drugs; Eszopiclone; Zolpidem; Major depressive disorder; Meta-analysis; Systematic review;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
No comprehensive meta-analysis has been performed concerning the efficacy and tolerability of Z-drug adjunctive therapy in antidepressant-treated major depressive disorder (MDD) patients. Randomized, placebo-, or antidepressant-alone-controlled trials of Z-drugs in MDD patients were included. The primary outcome measures for efficacy and safety were remission rate and all-cause discontinuation, respectively. The secondary outcome measures were response rate, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) total score improvement, discontinuation due to inefficacy and adverse events, and individual adverse effects. Risk ratio (RR), number needed to treat/harm (NNT/NNH), 95 % confidence intervals, and standardized mean difference (SMD) were calculated. We identified six studies [antidepressants were selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and venlafaxine, mean duration of study was 10.5 weeks, mean age of patients (mean ± standard deviation) was 44.4 ± 11.8 years old, total n = 2089, eszopiclone + antidepressants = 642, placebo + antidepressants = 930, antidepressants alone = 112, and zolpidem + antidepressants = 405]. Pooled Z-drug + antidepressants was superior to placebo + antidepressants regarding the remission rate (RR = 0.85, NNT = 10). Although pooled Z-drug + antidepressants was also superior to placebo + antidepressants/antidepressants alone regarding HAMD score improvement (SMD = −0.23), there was not significant difference in response rate and discontinuation due to inefficacy between groups. There was no difference in all-cause discontinuation between groups. Although there was also no difference in discontinuation due to adverse events between groups, pooled Z-drug + antidepressants was associated with a higher incidence of at least one adverse event (RR = 1.09, NNH = 20) and dizziness (RR = 1.76, NNH = 25) compared with the placebo + antidepressants/antidepressants alone. In conclusion, Z-drugs + antidepressants improves the treatment efficacy for MDD compared with the placebo + antidepressants/antidepressants alone. However, the therapy requires close monitoring of adverse events, particularly dizziness.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 161
页数:12
相关论文
共 255 条
[11]  
Chakraburtty A(2013)In the zzz zone: the effects of z-drugs on human performance and driving J Med Toxicol 9 163-171
[12]  
DuBoff EA(1960)A rating scale for depression J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 23 56-62
[13]  
Krystal A(2003)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses BMJ 327 557-560
[14]  
Londborg PD(2010)Gaba-a receptor modulators: can they offer any improvement over benzodiazepines in the treatment of anxiety disorders? CNS Neurosci Ther 16 61-62
[15]  
Rosenberg R(2007)effects of paroxetine with or without zolpidem on depression with insomnia: a multi-center randomized comparative study Zhonghua yi xue za zhi 87 1585-1589
[16]  
Roth-Schechter B(2014)Misuse of benzodiazepines and z-drugs in the uk Br J Psychiatry 205 407-408
[17]  
Scharf MB(2005)Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the national comorbidity survey replication Arch Gen Psychiatry 62 593-602
[18]  
Walsh JK(2015)Suvorexant for primary insomnia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials PLoS ONE 10 e0136910-392
[19]  
Bauer M(2014)Ramelteon for the treatment of insomnia in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis Sleep Med 15 385-2109
[20]  
Pfennig A(2011)Benzodiazepines revisited—will we ever learn? Addiction 106 2086-1161