Outcome choice and definition in systematic reviews leads to few eligible studies included in meta-analyses: a case study

被引:0
作者
Ian J. Saldanha
Kristina B. Lindsley
Sarah Money
Hannah J. Kimmel
Bryant T. Smith
Kay Dickersin
机构
[1] Brown University School of Public Health,Center for Evidence Synthesis in Health, Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice (Primary), Department of Epidemiology (Secondary)
[2] University Medical Center Utrecht,Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care
[3] Utrecht University,Center for Evidence Synthesis in Health, Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice
[4] ISA Group,Center for Evidence Synthesis in Health, Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice
[5] Brown University School of Public Health,Department of Epidemiology
[6] Brown University School of Public Health,undefined
[7] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health,undefined
来源
BMC Medical Research Methodology | / 20卷
关键词
Systematic review; Outcomes; Meta-analysis; Core outcome sets; Loss of information; Clinical trials;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 125 条
[1]  
Borenstein M(2010)A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis Res Synth Methods 1 97-111
[2]  
Hedges LV(2019)Choosing Core outcomes for use in clinical trials in ophthalmology: perspectives from three ophthalmology outcomes working groups Ophthalmology 126 6-9
[3]  
Higgins JP(2017)Cherry-picking by trialists and meta-analysts can drive conclusions about intervention efficacy Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 91 95-110
[4]  
Rothstein HR(2017)Practical guidance for using multiple data sources in systematic reviews and meta-analyses (with examples from the MUDS study) Research Synthesis Methods 9 2-12
[5]  
Saldanha IJ(2014)Outcomes in Cochrane systematic reviews addressing four common eye conditions: an evaluation of completeness and comparability PLoS One 9 e109400-94
[6]  
Le JT(2017)Clinical trials and systematic reviews addressing similar interventions for the same condition do not consider similar outcomes to be important: a case study in HIV/AIDS J Clin Epidemiol 84 85-940
[7]  
Solomon SD(2017)Comparison of clinical trial and systematic review outcomes for the 4 Most prevalent eye diseases JAMA Ophthalmology 135 933-860
[8]  
Repka MX(2011)The ClinicalTrials.gov results database--update and key issues N Engl J Med 364 852-294
[9]  
Akpek EK(2017)Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs versus corticosteroids for controlling inflammation after uncomplicated cataract surgery Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7 Cd010516-740
[10]  
Li T(2012)A web-based archive of systematic review data Syst Rev 1 15-2195