Similarity-Based Interference in Sentence Comprehension in Aphasia: a Computational Evaluation of Two Models of Cue-Based Retrieval

被引:0
作者
Lissón P. [1 ]
Paape D. [1 ]
Pregla D. [1 ]
Burchert F. [1 ]
Stadie N. [1 ]
Vasishth S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Linguistics, University of Potsdam, Potsdam
关键词
Aphasia; Cognitive modeling; Computational modeling; Cue-based retrieval; Sentence comprehension;
D O I
10.1007/s42113-023-00168-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Sentence comprehension requires the listener to link incoming words with short-term memory representations in order to build linguistic dependencies. The cue-based retrieval theory of sentence processing predicts that the retrieval of these memory representations is affected by similarity-based interference. We present the first large-scale computational evaluation of interference effects in two models of sentence processing — the activation-based model and a modification of the direct-access model — in individuals with aphasia (IWA) and control participants in German. The parameters of the models are linked to prominent theories of processing deficits in aphasia, and the models are tested against two linguistic constructions in German: pronoun resolution and relative clauses. The data come from a visual-world eye-tracking experiment combined with a sentence-picture matching task. The results show that both control participants and IWA are susceptible to retrieval interference, and that a combination of theoretical explanations (intermittent deficiencies, slow syntax, and resource reduction) can explain IWA’s deficits in sentence processing. Model comparisons reveal that both models have a similar predictive performance in pronoun resolution, but the activation-based model outperforms the direct-access model in relative clauses. © 2023, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:473 / 502
页数:29
相关论文
共 106 条
[1]  
Adelt A., Burchert F., Adani F., Stadie N., What matters in processing German object relative clauses in aphasia–timing or morpho-syntactic cues?, Aphasiology, 34, 8, pp. 970-998, (2020)
[2]  
Adelt A., Stadie N., Lassotta R., Adani F., Burchert F., Feature dissimilarities in the processing of German relative clauses in aphasia, Journal of Neurolinguistics, 44, pp. 17-37, (2017)
[3]  
Anderson J.R., Bothell D., Byrne M.D., Douglass S., Lebiere C., Qin Y., An integrated theory of the mind, Psychological Review, 111, 4, pp. 1036-1060, (2004)
[4]  
Arantzeta M., Webster J., Laka I., Martinez-Zabaleta M., Howard D., What happens when they think they are right? Error awareness analysis of sentence comprehension deficits in aphasia, Aphasiology, 32, 12, pp. 1418-1444, (2018)
[5]  
Badecker W., Straub K., The processing role of structural constraints on interpretation of pronouns and anaphors, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 4, (2002)
[6]  
Bader M., Meng M., Case attraction phenomena in German. Unpublished Manuscript, University of Jena, (1999)
[7]  
Bartek B., Lewis R.L., Vasishth S., Smith M.R., In search of on-line locality effects in sentence comprehension, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 5, pp. 1178-1198, (2011)
[8]  
Burchert F., de Bleser R., Passives in agrammatic sentence comprehension: A German study, Aphasiology, 18, 1, pp. 29-45, (2004)
[9]  
Burchert F., de Bleser R., Sonntag K., Does morphology make the difference? Agrammatic sentence comprehension in German, Brain and Language, 87, 2, pp. 323-342, (2003)
[10]  
Burchert F., Hanne S., Vasishth S., Sentence comprehension disorders in aphasia: The concept of chance performance revisited, Aphasiology, 27, 1, pp. 112-125, (2013)