Sharing design definitions across product life cycles

被引:0
作者
Amar Kumar Behera
Alison McKay
Christopher F. Earl
Hau Hing Chau
Mark A. Robinson
Alan de Pennington
David C. Hogg
机构
[1] Queen’s University Belfast,School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
[2] University of Leeds,School of Mechanical Engineering
[3] University of Leeds,Leeds University Business School
[4] The Open University,Department of Engineering and Innovation
[5] University of Leeds,School of Computing
来源
Research in Engineering Design | 2019年 / 30卷
关键词
Lattice structures; Qualitative data analysis; Bill of materials; Design definitions; BoM management; Robots;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The research reported in this paper explored the feasibility of embedding multiple design structures into design definitions with a view of sharing design definitions across product life cycles. Two separate case studies using (a) lattice theory and (b) a qualitative data analysis (QDA) software tool were used to illustrate the benefits of embedding. In the first case study, of a robotic arm assembly, lattices in the form of partially ordered sets are used to embed multiple design structures into a given design definition. A software prototype has been built that allows a design bill of materials (BoM) to be extracted from a STEP AP214 file and translated into a lattice that is visualized as a Hasse diagram. This lattice is a sub-lattice of a complete lattice that includes all possible BoM structures for the given collection of component parts in the assembly. New BoM design structures can be defined by selecting the required nodes in the complete lattice and alternative product definitions are then exported as new STEP files. The second case study introduces a collision avoidance robot with associated design structures. It is used to illustrate management of design information using a current technique, design structure matrix (DSM), and compared with how embedding using QDA has the potential to support the establishment of relationships between design structures. Results from these case studies demonstrate that it is feasible to use lattice theory as an underlying formalism and QDA as a means for sharing design definitions.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 361
页数:22
相关论文
共 97 条
  • [1] Ahmad S(2013)New product development: impact of project characteristics and development practices on performance J Prod Innov Manag 30 331-348
  • [2] Mallick DN(2004)Concept lattices and order in fuzzy logic Ann Pure Appl Logic 128 277-298
  • [3] Schroeder RG(2013)The evolution, challenges, and future of knowledge representation in product design systems Comput Aided Des 45 204-228
  • [4] Bĕlohlávek R(2015)Transitioning systems thinking to model-based systems engineering: systemigrams to SysML models IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 45 662-674
  • [5] Chandrasegaran SK(2007)Managing complex product development projects with design structure matrices and domain mapping matrices Int J Project Manag 25 300-314
  • [6] Ramani K(2013)Product relationships management enabler for concurrent engineering and product lifecycle management Comput Ind 64 833-848
  • [7] Sriram RD(2009)Annotation of lightweight formats for long-term product representations International J Comput Integr Manuf 22 1037-1053
  • [8] Horváth I(2009)The integration of lightweight representation and annotation for collaborative design representation Res Eng Des 20 185-200
  • [9] Bernard A(2013)That which is not form: the practical challenges in using functional concepts in design artificial intelligence for engineering design Anal Manuf 27 217-231
  • [10] Harik RF(2015)Advancing architecture options theory: six industrial case studies Syst Eng 18 396-414