Regional flood risk assessment via coupled fuzzy c-means clustering methods: an empirical analysis from China’s Huaihe River Basin

被引:0
作者
Zongzhi Wang
Jingjing Wu
Liang Cheng
Kelin Liu
Yi-Ming Wei
机构
[1] Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute,State Key Laboratory of Hydrology
[2] Hohai University,Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering
[3] Beijing Institute of Technology,College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering
[4] Beijing Institute of Technology,Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research
[5] Beijing Key Lab of Energy Economics and Environmental Management,School of Management and Economics
来源
Natural Hazards | 2018年 / 93卷
关键词
Flood risk assessment; Flood hazard; Vulnerability; Factor analysis; Fuzzy ; -means clustering; Clustering validity function; Huaihe River Basin;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study contributed to the comprehensive assessment of flood risk in the Huaihongnanpian flood control protected area (simplified as the HHNP) of the Huaihe River Basin in China. Flood risk analyses were performed by incorporating flood hazard and vulnerability. Flood hazard was simulated by a 1D–2D coupled hydrodynamic model. Flow velocity, inundation duration, and inundation depth were taken as hazard indicators, while agricultural population proportions, female population proportions, GDP per unit area, GDP per person, population density, residential density, shelter density, the land-use sensitivity index, road network density, and river network density were used as vulnerability indicators. Based on these indicators, a regional flood risk assessment model was put forward, which coupled fuzzy c-means clustering, factor analysis, and a clustering validity function. As an example, a proposed model was applied to evaluate the degree of flood risk for 15 townships in the HHNP. The research results showed that (1) flood risk in the HHNP was closely related to three main factors: socioeconomic factor, land cover factor, and flood factor; (2) the degree of risk was objectively divided into six zones: especially high, high, relatively high, medium, relatively low and low; and (3) in the 15 townships, Xiaobengbu (XB), Chengguan (CG), and Wuxiaojie (WX) fell into the especially high, high, and relatively high zones, respectively. Xinji (XJ), Toupu (TP), Daxin (DX), Caoguzhang (CGZ), Meiqiao (MQ), Caolaoji (CL), and Mohekou (MH) fell into the medium-risk zone. Linbeihuizu (LB) was categorized into the relatively low-risk zone, and Xinmaqiao (XM), Wangzhuang (WZ), Kuainan (KN), and Weizhuang (WZ) fell into the low-risk zone. The research results revealed the main driving factors and the spatial distribution of flood risk in the HHNP; therefore, it is highly significant for us to understand the main flood risk sources to provide guidance for flood control and management in the HHNP.
引用
收藏
页码:803 / 822
页数:19
相关论文
共 145 条
[1]  
Apel H(2009)Flood risk analyses—how detailed do we need to be? Nat Hazards 49 79-98
[2]  
Aronica GT(2004)Flood risk perception and implications for flood risk management in The Netherlands Int J River Basin Manag 2 113-122
[3]  
Kreibich H(2009)Probability-weighted hazard maps for comparing different flood risk management strategies: a case study Nat Hazards 50 479-496
[4]  
Baan PA(2015)An assessment of water quality in the coruh basin (Turkey) using multivariate statistical techniques Environ Monit Assess 187 1-16
[5]  
Klijn F(2006)Flood-risk mapping: contributions towards an enhanced assessment of extreme events and associated risks Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 6 485-503
[6]  
Baldassarre GD(2012)Flood vulnerability assessment of Poyang lake economical ecological zone at raster level Sci Geogr Sin 8 958-964
[7]  
Castellarin A(2015)Multi-variate analyses of flood loss in Can Tho City, Mekong Delta Water 8 6-1384
[8]  
Montanari A(2006)An application of a flood risk analysis system for impact analysis of a flood control plan in a river basin Hydrol Process 20 1365-209
[9]  
Bilgin A(2010)Micro-scale flood risk analysis based on detailed 2D hydraulic modelling and high resolution geographic data Nat Hazards 55 181-1178
[10]  
Büchele B(2012)Spatial disaster vulnerability and risk assessments: challenges in their quality and acceptance Nat Hazards 61 1161-5