Phylogeny of Molting Protostomes (Ecdysozoa) as Inferred from 18S and 28S rRNA Gene Sequences

被引:0
作者
N. B. Petrov
N. S. Vladychenskaya
机构
[1] Moscow State University,Belozersky Institute of Physicochemical Biology
来源
Molecular Biology | 2005年 / 39卷
关键词
18S rRNA; 28S rRNA; molecular phylogeny; Protostomia; Ecdysozoa; Arthropoda; Cephalorhyncha; Nematoda; Nematomorpha;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Phylogenetic relationships within the group of molting protostomes were reconstructed by comparing the sets of 18S and 28S rRNA gene sequences considered either separately or in combination. The reliability of reconstructions was estimated from the bootstrap indices for major phylogenetic tree nodes and from the degree of congruence of phylogenetic trees obtained by different methods. By either criterion, the phylogenetic trees reconstructed on the basis of both 18 and 28S rRNA gene sequences were better than those based on the 18S or 28S sequences alone. The results of reconstruction are consistent with the phylogenetic hypothesis classifying protostomes into two major clades: molting Ecdysozoa (Priapulida + Kinorhyncha, Nematoda + Nematomorpha, Onychophora + Tardigrada, Myriapoda + Chelicerata, and Crustacea + Hexapoda) and nonmolting Lophotrochozoa (Plathelminthes, Nemertini, Annelida, Mollusca, Echiura, and Sipuncula). Nematomorphs (Nematomorpha) do not belong to the clade Cephalorhyncha (Priapulida + Kinorhyncha). It is concluded that combined data on the 18S and 28S rRNA gene sequences provide a more reliable basis for phylogenetic inferences.
引用
收藏
页码:503 / 513
页数:10
相关论文
共 172 条
[1]  
Hillis D.M.(1991)Ribosomal DNA: Molecular evolution and phylogenetic inference Quart. Rev. Biol. 66 411-453
[2]  
Dixon M.T.(1988)Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase Science 239 487-491
[3]  
Saiki R.K.(1988)The characterization of enzymatically amplified eukaryotic 16S-like rRNA-coding regions Gene 71 491-499
[4]  
Gelfand D.H.(2002)The European database on small subunit ribosomal RNA Nucleic Acids Res. 30 183-185
[5]  
Stoffel S.(1998)The essential role of “minor” phyla in molecular studies of animal evolution Am. Zool. 38 907-917
[6]  
Scharf S.J.(2000)The new animal phylogeny: Reliability and implications Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97 4453-4456
[7]  
Higuchi R.(1998)The position of arthropods in the animal kingdom: A search for a reliable outgroup for internal arthropod phylogeny Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9 481-488
[8]  
Horn G.T.(2000)Triploblasic relationships with emphasis on the Acoelomates and the position of Gnathostomulida, Cycliophora, Plathelminthes, and Chaetognatha: A combined approach of 18S rDNA sequences and morphology Syst. Biol. 49 539-562
[9]  
Mullis K.B.(2001)Animal phylogeny and the ancestry of bilaterians: Inferences from morphology and 18S rDNA gene sequences Evol. Dev. 3 170-205
[10]  
Erlich H.A.(1998)Phylogeny of the Metazoa based on morphological and 18S ribosomal DNA evidence Cladistics 14 249-285