Renoprotective Effect of the Addition of Losartan to Ongoing Treatment with an Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor in Type-2 Diabetic Patients with Nephropathy

被引:0
作者
Hirohiko Abe
Shinya Minatoguchi
Hiroshige Ohashi
Ichijiro Murata
Taro Minagawa
Toshio Okuma
Hitomi Yokoyama
Hisato Takatsu
Tadatake Takaya
Toshihiko Nagano
Yukio Osumi
Masao Kakami
Tatsuo Tsukamoto
Tsutomu Tanaka
Kunihiko Hiei
Hisayoshi Fujiwara
机构
[1] Gifu University School of Medicine,Second Department of Internal Medicine
来源
Hypertension Research | 2007年 / 30卷
关键词
albuminuria; angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor; angiotensin II receptor blocker; diabetic nephropathy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are frequently used for the treatment for glomerulonephritis and diabetic nephropathy because of their albuminuria- or proteinuria-reducing effects. To many patients who are nonresponsive to monotherapy with these agents, combination therapy appears to be a good treatment option. In the present study, we examined the effects of the addition of an ARB (losartan) followed by titration upon addition and at 3 and 6 months (n=14) and the addition of an ACE-I followed by titration upon addition and at 3 and 6 months (n=20) to the drug regimen treatment protocol in type 2 diabetic patients with nephropathy for whom more than 3-month administration of an ACE-I or the combination of an ACE-I plus a conventional antihypertensive was ineffective to achieve a blood pressure (BP) of 130/80 mmHg and to reduce urinary albumin to <30 mg/day. During the 12-month treatment, addition of losartan or addition of an ACE-I to the treatment protocol reduced systolic blood pressure (SBP) by 10% and 12%, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) by 7% and 4%, and urinary albumin excretion by 38% and 20% of the baseline value, respectively. However, the effects on both BP and urinary albumin were not significantly different between the two therapies. In conclusion, addition of losartan or an ACE-I to an ongoing treatment with an ACE-I, or addition of an ACE-I to ongoing treatment with a conventional antihypertensive were equally effective at reducing the urinary albumin excretion and BP, and provided renal protection in patients with type-2 diabetic nephropathy.
引用
收藏
页码:929 / 935
页数:6
相关论文
共 94 条
[1]  
Remuzzi G(1997)Understanding the nature of renal disease progression Kidney Int 51 1-15
[2]  
Ruggenenti P(1996)Titrating for antiproteinuric effect; the clue to renoprotection? J Hum Hypertens 10 669-673
[3]  
Benigni A(1994)Proteinuria—a direct cause of renal morbidity? Kidney Int 45 443-450
[4]  
Navi SG(1995)Blood pressure control, proteinuria, and the progression of renal disease Ann Intern Med 123 754-762
[5]  
de Zeeuw D(1993)The effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on diabetic nephropathy N Eng J Med 329 1456-1462
[6]  
William JD(1996)Effect of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor benazepril on the progression of chronic renal insufficiency New Engl J Med 334 939-945
[7]  
Coles GA(1996)Long term renoprotective effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in non–insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus Arch Intern Med 334 939-945
[8]  
Peterson JC(1997)Protecting thr residual renal function: which drugs of choice? Am J Hypertens 10 159S-166S
[9]  
Adler S(2001)Additive antiproteinuric effect of converting enzyme inhibitor and losartan in normotensive patients with IgA nephropathy Am J Kidney Dis 38 18-25
[10]  
Burkart J(2001)Coadministration of losartan and enalapril exerts additive antiproteinuric effect in IgA nephropathy Am J Kidney Dis 38 18-25