Comparison of DNA Extraction and PCR Setup Methods for Use in High-Throughput DNA Barcoding of Fish Species

被引:1
作者
Rosalee S. Hellberg
Michael D. Kawalek
Khanh T. Van
Yuelian Shen
Donna M. Williams-Hill
机构
[1] Chapman University,School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Food Science and Nutrition
[2] Office of Regulatory Affairs,undefined
[3] Pacific Regional Laboratory Southwest,undefined
[4] U.S. Food and Drug Administration,undefined
[5] Office of Regulatory Affairs,undefined
[6] Office of Regional Operations/Division of Field Science,undefined
[7] U.S. Food and Drug Administration,undefined
来源
Food Analytical Methods | 2014年 / 7卷
关键词
DNA barcoding; DNA extraction; Fish species identification; PCR; Sequencing;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
DNA barcoding is a sequencing-based method that can be used for the identification of fish species in a regulatory setting. The objective of this study was to compare modified versions of three DNA extraction kits (i.e., Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit, Sigma-Aldrich Extract-N-Amp Kit; and Life Technologies MagMax-96 DNA Multi-Sample Kit) and two polymerase chain reaction (PCR) setup methods (manual vs. automated) for use in DNA barcoding, with a focus on minimizing time, costs, and labor. DNA was extracted from 83 fish products using each of the three kits and the results were compared based on sequencing success and sequencing quality parameters. A subset of 14 fish products was also tested in triplicate to compare PCR setup methods. Initially, reduced sequencing success was observed with the MagMax Kit (88 %) compared to the other two kits (95–96 %); however, after PCR and sequencing were repeated for DNA samples that initially failed, all three methods showed very high sequencing success (98–99 %). Overall, the modified Extract-N-Amp Kit offered the greatest reduction in time and costs, while the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit produced sequences with the highest quality and highest initial success rates. Automation of the PCR setup process resulted in slightly greater success (100 %) compared to manual PCR setup (98 %), and reduced the potential for human error that may result from manual pipetting. The results of this study demonstrate the advantages of incorporating rapid and/or automated methods into the DNA barcoding workflow, especially with regard to high-throughput operations.
引用
收藏
页码:1950 / 1959
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Cawthorn DM(2011)Comparative study of different methods for the extraction of DNA from fish species commercially available in South Africa Food Control 22 231-244
  • [2] Steinman HA(2009)Public health response to puffer fish (tetrodotoxin) poisoning from mislabeled product J Food Protect 72 810-817
  • [3] Witthuhn RC(2005)Critical factors for assembling a high volume of DNA barcodes Philos Trans R Soc B 360 1959-1967
  • [4] Cohen NJ(2011)A single-laboratory validated method for the generation of DNA barcodes for the identification of fish for regulatory compliance J AOAC Int 94 1-10
  • [5] Deeds JR(2003)Biological identifications through DNA barcodes Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 270 313-321
  • [6] Wong ES(2006)An inexpensive, automation-friendly protocol for recovering high-quality DNA Mol Ecol Notes 6 998-1002
  • [7] Hajibabaei M(2010)Real-time PCR assay for the detection of pufferfish products J Food Protect 73 1698-1702
  • [8] deWaard JR(2008)DNA-based methods for the identification of commercial fish and seafood dpecies CRFSFS 7 280-295
  • [9] Ivanova NV(2009)The campaign to DNA barcode all fishes, FISH-BOL J Fish Biol 74 329-356
  • [10] Handy SM(2008)DNA barcoding detects market substitution in North American seafood Food Res Int 41 828-837