Estimating the number of opiate users in Amsterdam by capture–recapture: The importance of case definition

被引:0
|
作者
M.C.A. Buster
G.H.A. van Brussel
W. van den Brink
机构
[1] Municipal Health Service Amsterdam,Department of Epidemiology, Documentation and Health Promotion
[2] Municipal Health Service Amsterdam,Drug
[3] Amsterdam Institute for Addiction Research AIAR,department
来源
European Journal of Epidemiology | 2001年 / 17卷
关键词
heroin; methadone treatment; prevalence; substance abuse;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
One of the objectives of Amsterdam's methadone maintenance treatment is maximising its coverage among problematic opiate users. In order to evaluate what proportion is reached, the capture–recapture method is conducted to estimate the prevalence of problematic opiate use. Samples of opiate users in contact with police, hospital or treatment are used. The treatment sample is limited to the low threshold treatment sample (treatment with minimal requirements to the clients). Based on differences of log likelihood ratio, Akaike's and Bayesian information criteria, log linear models are selected. The size of the population of problematic opiate users in 1997 is estimated to be 4130 (95% confidence interval: 3753–4566). Within 3 months 50% was registered: 16% at the police, 2.5% at the hospital and 40% at treatment. This study shows that the Amsterdam methadone treatment programs succeed in reaching a high proportion of problematic opiate users. The estimation of the prevalence of problematic opiate users is considered to be valid. However, if, instead of the low threshold treatment, the total treatment sample had been used, the population of interest and the sampled population would not match correctly, and prevalence would have been overestimated.
引用
收藏
页码:935 / 942
页数:7
相关论文
共 8 条
  • [1] Estimating the number of opiate users in Amsterdam by capture recapture: The importance of case definition
    Buster, MCA
    van Brussel, GHA
    van den Brink, W
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 17 (10) : 935 - 942
  • [2] Estimating the number of injection drug users in greater Victoria, Canada using capture-recapture methods
    Xu, Yuan
    Fyfe, Murray
    Walker, Liz
    Cowen, Laura L. E.
    HARM REDUCTION JOURNAL, 2014, 11
  • [3] Estimating the number of street children and adolescents in two cities of Brazil using capture-recapture
    Bezerra, Katia Floripes
    Gurgel, Ricardo Queiroz
    Ilozue, Chinenye
    Castaneda, Daniel Neyra
    JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH, 2011, 47 (08) : 524 - 529
  • [4] Estimating the number of farms experienced foot and mouth disease outbreaks using capture-recapture methods
    Chalutwan Sansamur
    Anuwat Wiratsudakul
    Arisara Charoenpanyanet
    Veerasak Punyapornwithaya
    Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2021, 53
  • [5] Estimating the number of farms experienced foot and mouth disease outbreaks using capture-recapture methods
    Sansamur, Chalutwan
    Wiratsudakul, Anuwat
    Charoenpanyanet, Arisara
    Punyapornwithaya, Veerasak
    TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2021, 53 (01)
  • [6] Estimating prevalence of opiate and crack cocaine use and injecting in England using mixed-effects capture-recapture models
    Djennad, Abdelmajid
    Harris, Ross J.
    Presanis, Anne M.
    Jahr, Stefan
    Charlett, Andre
    De Angelis, Daniela
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 2024, 188 (01) : 68 - 83
  • [7] Estimating long-term trends in the incidence and prevalence of opiate use/injecting drug use and the number of former users: Back-calculation methods and opiate overdose deaths
    De Angelis, D
    Hickman, M
    Yang, SY
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 160 (10) : 994 - 1004
  • [8] Analytical considerations in the use of capture-recapture to estimate prevalence:: Case studies of the estimation of opiate use in the metropolitan area og Barcelona, Spain
    Domingo-Salvany, A
    Hartnoll, RL
    Maguire, A
    Brugal, MT
    Albertín, P
    Caylà, JA
    Casabona, J
    Suelves, JM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 148 (08) : 732 - 740