Textures shape the attentional focus: Evidence from exogenous and endogenous cueing

被引:0
|
作者
Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld
Anna Schubö
机构
[1] Germany Philipps-University Marburg,Department of Experimental and Biological Psychology
来源
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics | 2013年 / 75卷
关键词
Attention; Texture; Visual search; Cueing; Textons;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The spatial cueing paradigm (Posner Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 32:3–25, 1980) has often been used to investigate the time course of the deployment of visual attention in space. In a series of eight experiments we investigated whether spatial cues would not only enhance processing of stimuli presented at cued locations, but also enhance processing of the entire texture in which the stimuli were presented. Results showed highest accuracy for responses to stimuli presented at cued locations, a replication of the traditional cueing effect (Posner 1980). Additionally, stimuli presented at uncued locations were responded to with higher accuracy when they were presented inside the same texture as the cued location, as compared with stimuli presented outside the texture with the cued location. To investigate this texture advantage for both automatic and voluntary attention deployment, exogenous and endogenous cues were used. The texture advantage was observed for short interstimulus intervals (ISIs) of 50 and 100 ms for exogenous cues and for a longer ISI of 200 ms for endogenous cues. These findings indicate that the arrangement of task-irrelevant visual stimuli also can have a large impact on the cueing effect. This suggests that visual spatial attention spreads texture-wise across the visual field. Control experiments revealed that the homogeneity within texture elements contributes most to the effect but that the texture advantage is a function of both orientation contrast at the texture border and homogeneity within texture elements.
引用
收藏
页码:1644 / 1666
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Endogenous temporal and spatial orienting: Evidence for two distinct attentional mechanisms
    Noam Weinbach
    Inbal Shofty
    Shai Gabay
    Avishai Henik
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2015, 22 : 967 - 973
  • [22] Additive effects of emotional, endogenous, and exogenous attention: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence
    Brosch, Tobias
    Pourtois, Gilles
    Sander, David
    Vuilleumier, Patrik
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2011, 49 (07) : 1779 - 1787
  • [23] Training enhances attentional expertise, but not attentional capacity: Evidence from content-specific training benefits
    Strong, Roger W.
    Alvarez, George A.
    JOURNAL OF VISION, 2017, 17 (04): : 1 - 11
  • [24] A unitary focus of spatial attention during attentional capture: Evidence from event-related brain potentials
    Grubert, Anna
    Righi, Luana Lira
    Eimer, Martin
    JOURNAL OF VISION, 2013, 13 (03):
  • [25] Splitting the attentional spotlight? Evidence from attentional capture by successive events
    Gabbay, Coral
    Zivony, Alon
    Lamy, Dominique
    VISUAL COGNITION, 2019, : 518 - 536
  • [26] Evidence from partially valid cueing that words are processed serially
    Miranda Johnson
    John Palmer
    Cathleen M. Moore
    Geoffrey M. Boynton
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2023, 30 : 1539 - 1548
  • [27] Cognitive processes facilitated by contextual cueing: Evidence from event-related brain potentials
    Schankin, Andrea
    Schuboe, Anna
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 46 (03) : 668 - 679
  • [28] AN UNORTHODOX APPROACH TOWARDS SHAPE FROM FOCUS
    Muhammad, Mannan Saeed
    Choi, Tae-Sun
    2011 18TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING (ICIP), 2011,
  • [29] Visual statistical learning in children and adults: evidence from probability cueing
    Yang, Yingying
    Song, Qiongya
    PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2021, 85 (08): : 2911 - 2921
  • [30] On the saliency of negative stimuli: Evidence from attentional blink
    Ogawa, T
    Suzuki, N
    JAPANESE PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2004, 46 (01) : 20 - 30