Posing Fundable Questions in Mathematics and Science Education

被引:0
作者
K. D. King
R. J. Ochsendorf
G. E. A. Solomon
F. C. Sloane
机构
[1] National Science Foundation,
来源
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education | 2020年 / 18卷
关键词
Federal funding; Mathematics education; Science education; Research design; Research questions;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this article, the authors describe critical issues related to the pursuit of rigorous and innovative research in the fields of mathematics and science education. The paper is framed to help researchers consider aspects of both their research project and their research proposal. The authors describe features of high-quality and fundable research projects and whether the research is intended to support descriptive, design-oriented, or causal interpretation. They discuss the critical role of grounding proposed research in existing literatures; attending to relevant research from associated fields; and posing research questions that are clear, specific, and feasibly addressable. The goals of the research should cohere with the methodological and analytic design proposed. The authors also discuss the multidisciplinary nature of research that has implications for practice in general and for educational practice more specifically. The authors touch on the characteristics of more and less successful interdisciplinary research teams, especially those that draw from education, cognitive science, methodology, educational psychology, the learning sciences, and relevant STEM disciplinary fields. Examples of STEM education research questions from different genres of research are considered and the authors describe how the questions themselves give rise to specific design choices, methodologies, measures, study samples, and analytical models as well as how they can reflect the disciplinary orientations of the researchers. Implications of these issues for successful educational research grant proposal writing are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 36
页数:11
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Ahmadpoor M(2019)Decoding team and individual impact in science and invention Proceedings of the National Academies of Science 116 13885-13890
  • [2] Jones BF(2013)Is the Nobel prize good for science? The FASEB Journal 27 4682-4690
  • [3] Casadevall A(2005)Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational boundaries Social Studies of Science 35 703-722
  • [4] Fang FC(2018)What do teachers share within socialized knowledge communities: A case of Pinterest Journal of Professional Capital and Community 3 97-122
  • [5] Cummings JN(2017)A measure of knowledge flow between specific fields: Implications of interdisciplinarity for impact and funding PLoS One 12 20-32
  • [6] Kiesler S(2019)Executive function deficits in kindergarten predict repeated academic difficulties across elementary school Early Childhood Research Quarterly 46 15-21
  • [7] Hu S(2002)Evidence-based education policies: Transforming educational practice and research Educational Researcher 31 624-630
  • [8] Torphy KT(2008)Randomized trials in mathematics education: Recalibrating the proposed high watermark Educational Researcher 37 103835-255
  • [9] Opperman A(2019)What people learn about how people learn: An analysis of citation behavior and the multidisciplinary flow of knowledge Research Policy 48 2332858418784914-undefined
  • [10] Jansen K(2018)Black teachers’ retention and transfer patterns in North Carolina: How do patterns vary by teacher effectiveness, subject, and school conditions? AERA Open 4 1036-undefined