Systematic assessment of extraction of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in water and sediment followed by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry

被引:0
作者
Daniele Sadutto
Rodrigo Álvarez-Ruiz
Yolanda Picó
机构
[1] Environmental and Food Safety Research Group of the University of Valencia (SAMA-UV),
[2] Desertification Research Centre (CIDE),undefined
[3] CSIC-UV-GV,undefined
来源
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry | 2020年 / 412卷
关键词
Pharmaceuticals and personal care products; Ion pairing; Environmental matrices; High-performance liquid chromatography–tandem and mass spectrometry; Sodium dodecyl sulfate solution; Solid-phase extraction;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Two solid-phase extraction methods were systematically studied to determine 32 pharmaceuticals and personal care products in water and sediments by ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. One involves HLB cartridges activated with sodium dodecyl sulfate before the passage of the sample to form an ion pair with cationic analytes, and the other uses mixed HLB–cation exchange cartridges. The accuracy of the sodium dodecyl sulfate method was good for most compounds (recoveries of 61–120% with relative standard deviation less than 23%). However, the recoveries for atorvastatin, codeine, paracetamol, flufenamic acid, and salicylic acid were approximately 50% and for omeprazole and triclocarban were even lower (from 0 to 12%). The detection limits were 1.65–25 ng L-1 in water and 0.33–4.00 ng g-1 (dry weight) in sediment. The recoveries for the mixed-mode cartridge (Strata-X-CW) method ranged from 57% to 120% with relative standard deviation less than 21%, with the exception of codeine [25% (water)], metformin [11% (sediment)], paracetamol [48% (sediment)], and salicylic acid [32% (sediment)]. The detection limits were 1.65–38.35 ng L-1 in water and 0.33–10 ng g-1 (dry weight) in sediment. Both methods followed the same pattern when applied to water. For sediments, the recoveries, which offer good performance, were not very high, although 60% of the compounds had recoveries greater 80%. The methods were applied to the analysis of surface water and sediments from the Albufera Natural Park (Spain). Twenty-seven of 32 analytes were detected in the samples analyzed.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 127
页数:14
相关论文
共 161 条
[1]  
Carmona E(2018)The use of chromatographic methods coupled to mass spectrometry for the study of emerging pollutants in the environment Crit Rev Aanal Chem. 48 305-316
[2]  
Picó Y(2018)A review of the pharmaceutical exposome in aquatic fauna Environ Pollut. 239 129-146
[3]  
Miller TH(2014)Bioaccumulation and biomagnification potential of pharmaceuticals with a focus to the aquatic environment J Environ Manage. 133 378-387
[4]  
Bury NR(2018)Diclofenac in the marine environment: a review of its occurrence and effects Mar Pollut Bull. 131 496-506
[5]  
Owen SF(2018)Evaluation of the water quality status of two surface water reservoirs in a Mediterranean island Environ Monit Assess. 190 570-512
[6]  
MacRae JI(2016)Analysis of the presence of perfluoroalkyl substances in water, sediment and biota of the Jucar River (E Spain). Sources, partitioning and relationships with water physical characteristics Environ Res. 147 503-26
[7]  
Barron LP(2010)Selection of low cost materials for the sorption of copper and herbicides as single or mixed compounds in increasing complexity matrices J Hazard Mater. 182 18-106
[8]  
Zenker A(2004)Selective removal of the heavy metal ions from waters and industrial wastewaters by ion-exchange method Chemosphere. 56 91-643
[9]  
Cicero MR(2010)Metals, minerals and microbes: geomicrobiology and bioremediation Microbiology. 156 609-235
[10]  
Prestinaci F(2015)A critical review of the state of the art of solid-phase microextraction of complex matrices I. Environmental analysis Trends Anal Chem 71 224-31