Endothelial dysfunction in breast cancer survivors on aromatase inhibitors: changes over time

被引:1
作者
Shaaban, Adnan [1 ]
Petersen, Ashley [3 ]
Beckwith, Heather [4 ]
Florea, Natalia [5 ]
Potter, David A. [4 ]
Yee, Douglas [4 ]
Vogel, Rachel I. [6 ]
Duprez, Daniel [7 ]
Blaes, Anne H. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Div Hosp Med, Dept Internal Med, Columbus, OH USA
[2] 420 Delaware St SE,MMC 480, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Div Biostat & Hlth Data Sci, Minneapolis, MN USA
[4] Univ Minnesota, Dept Internal Med, Div Hematol Oncol & Transplantat, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[5] Univ Minnesota, Dept Internal Med, Div Cardiol, Minneapolis, MN USA
[6] Univ Minnesota, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Womens Hlth, Div Gynecol Oncol, Minneapolis, MN USA
[7] Univ Minnesota, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Minneapolis, MN USA
关键词
Cardiotoxicity; Breast cancer; Aromatase inhibitors; Endothelial function; CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE; ANASTROZOLE; ESTROGENS; RISK;
D O I
10.1186/s40959-024-00227-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Breast cancer is estimated to comprise about 290,560 new cases in 2022. Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are recommended as adjuvant treatment for estrogen-receptor positive (ER+) breast carcinoma in postmenopausal women, which includes approximately two-thirds of all women with breast cancer. AIs inhibit the peripheral conversion of androgens to estrogen by deactivation of the aromatase enzyme, leading to a reduction in serum estrogen level in postmenopausal women with ER+ breast carcinoma. Estrogen is known for its cardiovascular (CV) protective properties through a variety of mechanisms including vasodilation of blood vessels and inhibition of vascular injury resulting in the prevention of atherosclerosis. In clinical trials and prospective cohorts, the long-term use of AIs can increase the risk for hypertension and hyperlipidemia. Studies demonstrate mixed results as to the impact of AIs on actual CV events and overall survival.Methods A single arm longitudinal study of 14 postmenopausal women with ER+ breast cancer prescribed adjuvant AIs at the University of Minnesota (UMN). Subjects with a history of known tobacco use, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes were excluded to eliminate potential confounding factors. Participants underwent routine labs, blood pressure assessments, and vascular testing at baseline (prior to starting AIs) and at six months. Vascular assessment was performed using the EndoPAT 2000 and HDI/PulseWave CR-2000 Cardiovascular Profiling System and pulse contour analysis on two occasions as previously described. Vascular measurements were conducted by one trained vascular technician. Assessments were performed in triplicate, and the mean indices were used for analyses. All subjects were on an AI at the follow-up visit. The protocol was approved by the UMN Institutional Review Board and all participants were provided written informed consent. Baseline and follow-up characteristics were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Analyses were performed using R version 3.6.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).Results After six months of AI treatment, EndoPAT (R) ratio declined to a median 1.12 (Q1: 0.85, Q3: 1.86; p = 0.045; Figure 1) and median estradiol levels decreased to 2 pg/mL (Q1: 2, Q3: 3; p=0.052). There was no evidence of association between change in EndoPAT (R) and change in estradiol level (p = 0.91). There were no statistically significant changes in small or large arterial elasticity.Conclusions We hypothesize that long-term use of AI can lead to persistent endothelial dysfunction, and further investigation is necessary. In our study, patients were on AI for approximately 5-10 years. As a result, we do not have data on whether these changes, such as EndoPAT (R) ratio and the elasticity of small and large arterial, are reversible with discontinuation of AI. These findings set the stage for a larger study to more conclusively determine the association between AI exposure and cardiovascular outcomes. Further studies should evaluate for multivariate associations withmodifiable risk factors for CV disease.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Aromatase inhibitors: past, present and future in breast cancer therapy
    Dutta, Udayan
    Pant, Kartikeya
    MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 25 (02) : 113 - 124
  • [32] Aromatase inhibitors and contralateral breast cancer in BRCA mutation carriers
    Shafaee, Maryam Nemati
    Goutsouliak, Kristina
    Lin, Heather
    Bevers, Therese B.
    Gutierrez-Barrera, Angelica
    Bondy, Melissa
    Arun, Banu
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2022, 196 (01) : 143 - 152
  • [33] Aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer
    Hiscox, Stephen
    Davies, Eleri Lloyd
    Barrett-Lee, Peter
    MATURITAS, 2009, 63 (04) : 275 - 279
  • [34] Aromatase inhibitors for breast cancer
    Susanne Briest
    Nancy E. Davidson
    Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, 2007, 8 : 215 - 228
  • [35] Aromatase Inhibitors and Breast Cancer
    Macedo, Luciana Furtado
    Sabnis, Gauri
    Brodie, Angela
    STEROID ENZYMES AND CANCER, 2009, 1155 : 162 - 173
  • [36] Prevalence and risk factors for fatigue among breast cancer survivors on aromatase inhibitors
    Mao, Huijuan
    Bao, Ting
    Shen, Xueyong
    Li, Qing
    Seluzicki, Christina
    Im, Eun-Ok
    Mao, Jun J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 101 : 47 - 54
  • [37] Aromatase inhibitors: past, present and future in breast cancer therapy
    Udayan Dutta
    Kartikeya Pant
    Medical Oncology, 2008, 25 : 113 - 124
  • [38] Aromatase inhibitors for breast cancer
    Briest, Susanne
    Davidson, Nancy E.
    REVIEWS IN ENDOCRINE & METABOLIC DISORDERS, 2007, 8 (03) : 215 - 228
  • [39] Cardiotoxicity of Aromatase Inhibitors in Breast Cancer Patients
    Foglietta, Jennifer
    Inno, Alessandro
    de Iuliis, Francesca
    Sini, Valentina
    Duranti, Simona
    Turazza, Monica
    Tarantini, Luigi
    Gori, Stefania
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2017, 17 (01) : 11 - 17
  • [40] Aromatase inhibitors for therapy of advanced breast cancer
    Ingle, JN
    Suman, VJ
    JOURNAL OF STEROID BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2005, 95 (1-5) : 113 - 119