The impact of introducing a no oral contrast abdominopelvic CT examination (NOCAPE) pathway on radiology turn around times, emergency department length of stay, and patient safety

被引:30
作者
Razavi S.A. [1 ]
Johnson J.-O. [2 ]
Kassin M.T. [3 ]
Applegate K.E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
[2] Division of Emergency Radiology, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, 30308, GA
[3] Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
关键词
Abdominal pain; Abdominopelvic computed tomography; Emergency department; Enteric contrast; Length of stay; Patient safety; Turn around time;
D O I
10.1007/s10140-014-1240-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This investigation evaluates the impact of the no oral contrast abdominopelvic CT examination (NOCAPE) on radiology turn around time (TAT), emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS), and patient safety metrics. During a 12-month period at two urban teaching hospitals, 6,409 ED abdominopelvic (AP) CTs were performed to evaluate acute abdominal pain. NOCAPE represented 70.9 % of all ED AP CT examinations with intravenous contrast. Data collection included patient demographics, use of intravenous (IV) and/or oral contrast, order to complete and order to final interpretation TAT, ED LOS, admission, recall and bounce back rates, and comparison and characterization of impressions. The NOCAPE pathway reduced median order to complete TAT by 32 min (22.9 %) compared to IV and oral contrast AP CT examinations (traditional pathway) (P < 0.001). Median order to final TAT was 2.9 h in NOCAPE patients and 3.5 h in the traditional pathway, a 36-min (17.1 %) reduction (P < 0.001). Overall, the NOCAPE pathway reduced ED LOS by a median of 43 min (8.8 %) compared to the traditional pathway (8.2 vs 7.5 h) (P = 0.003). Recall and bounce back rates were 3.2 %, and only one patient had change in impression after oral contrast CT was repeated. The NOCAPE pathway is associated with decreased radiology TAT and ED LOS metrics. The authors suggest that NOCAPE implementation in the ED setting is safe and positively impacts both radiology and emergency medicine workflow. © 2014, Am Soc Emergency Radiol.
引用
收藏
页码:605 / 613
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Rosen M.P., Sands D.Z., Longmaid H.E., Et al., Impact of abdominal CT on the management of patients presenting to the emergency department with acute abdominal pain, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 174, 5, pp. 1391-1396, (2000)
[2]  
Lee S.I., Chew F.S., 1998 ARRS Executive Council Award. Radiology in the emergency department: technique for quantitative description of use and results. American Roentgen Ray Society, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 171, 3, pp. 559-564, (1998)
[3]  
Broder J., Warshauer D.M., Increasing utilization of computed tomography in the adult emergency department, 2000-2005, Emerg Radiol, 13, 1, pp. 25-30, (2006)
[4]  
Joyce W.P., Delaney P.V., Gorey T.F., Et al., The value of water-soluble contrast radiology in the management of acute small bowel obstruction, Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 74, 6, pp. 422-425, (1992)
[5]  
Lonnemark M., Magnusson A., Ahlstrom H., Oral contrast media in CT of the abdomen. A double-blind randomized study comparing an aqueous solution of amidotrizoate, an aqueous solution of iohexol and a viscous solution of iohexol, Acta Radiol, 34, 5, pp. 517-519, (1993)
[6]  
Malone A.J., Wolf C.R., Malmed A.S., Et al., Diagnosis of acute appendicitis: value of unenhanced CT, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 160, 4, pp. 763-766, (1993)
[7]  
Anderson B.A., Salem L., Flum D.R., A systematic review of whether oral contrast is necessary for the computed tomography diagnosis of appendicitis in adults, Am J Surg, 190, 3, pp. 474-478, (2005)
[8]  
Lee S.Y., Coughlin B., Wolfe J.M., Et al., Prospective comparison of helical CT of the abdomen and pelvis without and with oral contrast in assessing acute abdominal pain in adult Emergency Department patients, Emerg Radiol, 12, 4, pp. 150-157, (2006)
[9]  
Tamburrini S., Brunetti A., Brown M., Et al., Acute appendicitis: diagnostic value of nonenhanced CT with selective use of contrast in routine clinical settings, Eur Radiol, 17, 8, pp. 2055-2061, (2007)
[10]  
Lane M.J., Liu D.M., Huynh M.D., Et al., Suspected acute appendicitis: nonenhanced helical CT in 300 consecutive patients, Radiology, 213, 2, pp. 341-346, (1999)