Analysis of the robustness of the French flood warning system: a study based on the 2009 flood of the Garonne River

被引:0
作者
F. Daupras
J. M. Antoine
S. Becerra
A. Peltier
机构
[1] Maison de la Recherche de l’Université du Mirail 5,GEODE, UMR 5602 CNRS
[2] Université de Toulouse,CNRS, IRD, Géosciences Environnement Toulouse (GET), Observatoire Midi Pyrénées
来源
Natural Hazards | 2015年 / 75卷
关键词
Flood warning; France; Robustness; Coping capacities; Vulnerability; Collective action;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The reorganisation of the French flood warning system initiated in 2002 expresses the State’s motivation to improve the anticipation and reactivity of crisis management services. However, the example of the 2009 flood in the Garonne Marmandaise territory highlights vulnerabilities in institutional warnings, resulting partly from the reorganisation of the flood warning system. Although this flood was perceived as ordinary by the mayors, several communities were flooded and became isolated. The present study focuses on adjustments carried out by stakeholders during the flood warning process. The concept of robustness is applied to the French flood warning system through the analysis of (1) the resources mobilised by stakeholders to process the warning, (2) the constraints that hinder their actions, (3) the interactions and the efforts of coordination that link stakeholders within the system. Our results indicate that the robustness of the flood warning system partially rests upon the coping capacities present at a local level. Indeed, these coping capacities allowed institutional vulnerabilities to be overcome during the 2009 event. In addition, feedback engaged after the 2009 flood favoured interactions and sharing of lay and scientific knowledge among the French flood warning system stakeholders. These interactions reinforced both the French flood warning system’s robustness and coping capacities at a local level.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 241
页数:26
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Atwood LE(1998)Exploring the “Cry Wolf” hypothesis Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 16 279-302
[2]  
Major AM(2007)A disaster risk management performance index Nat Hazards 41 1-20
[3]  
Carreño ML(2009)Warning! The use of meteorological information during a flash-flood warning process Adv Sci Res 3 99-103
[4]  
Cardona OD(2013)Stakeholders’ issues for action during the warning process and the interpretation of forecasts’ uncertainties Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13 1469-1479
[5]  
Barbat AH(2006)Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity Glob Environ Change 16 293-303
[6]  
Créton-Cazanave L(1984)La crue de décembre 1981 dans le bassin de la Garonne Revue de Géographie des Pyrénées et du Sud-Ouest 55 5-28
[7]  
Créton-Cazanave L(2001)Improving flood warnings in Europe: a research nd policy agenda Environ Hazards 3 19-28
[8]  
Lutoff C(1973)Resilience and stability of ecological systems Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4 1-23
[9]  
Gallopín GC(2012)FIM FRAME: a method for assessing and improving emergency plans for floods Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12 1731-1746
[10]  
Gazelle F(2011)The meaning of system robustness for flood risk management Environ Sci Policy 14 1121-1131