Sub-seasonal prediction skill for the stratospheric meridional mass circulation variability in CFSv2

被引:1
作者
Yueyue Yu
Ming Cai
Chunhua Shi
Ruikai Yan
Jian Rao
机构
[1] Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology,Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education (KLME), Joint International Research Laboratory of Climate and Environment Change (ILCEC), Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast
[2] Florida State University,FEMD)
来源
Climate Dynamics | 2019年 / 53卷
关键词
Subseasonal prediction skill; Stratosphere; Meridional mass circulation; CFSv2;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study evaluates the prediction skill for the stratospheric mass circulation variability in winter (November–March) in the Climate Forecast System, version 2 (CFSv2), from 2011 to 2018. Three stratospheric mass circulation indices measuring meridional mass transport into the polar stratosphere by the total flow (ST60N), wavenumber-1 (ST60N_W1), and wavenumber-2 waves (ST60N_W2) are considered. The variability of ST60N is mainly contributed by ST60N_W1 and ST60N_W2, and these indices are good indicators of the timing and locations of the continental-scale cold-air outbreaks (CAOs) at mid-latitudes. Thus, their potentially useful prediction skill can be utilized to make sub-seasonal forecasts of CAOs in a dynamical and statistical hybrid paradigm. Systematic forecast bias is found in both the 7-year averaged winter mean and seasonal cycle, which is tied to the overestimation of damping in amplitude and westward tilting variations of total waves and difficulties in forecasting the exact contributions from different spatial scales of waves. The intraseasonal variations of stratospheric mass circulation indices, with the systematic forecast bias corrected, can be modestly predicted at a forecast lead time of about 20 days, in terms of both the anomaly value and timing of negative and positive peak events. The sub-seasonal predictability of the ST60N value mainly comes from the ST60N_W1, while the predictability of the timing of positive and negative peaks comes from the ST60N_W2. The 20-day prediction limit of the stratospheric mass circulation indices is mainly due to the 2-week limit of the CFSv2 model in predicting the variability of anomalous wave tilt angle, whereas the prediction limit of the wave amplitude anomaly can exceed 50 days.
引用
收藏
页码:631 / 650
页数:19
相关论文
共 135 条
[1]  
Baldwin MP(2001)Stratospheric harbingers of anomalous weather regimes Science 294 581-584
[2]  
Dunkerton TJ(2003)Stratospheric memory and skill of extended-range weather forecasts Science 301 636-640
[3]  
Baldwin MP(2014)A total flow perspective of atmospheric mass and angular momentum circulations: Boreal winter mean state J Atmos Sci 71 2244-2263
[4]  
Stephenson DB(2014)The continuous mutual evolution of equatorial waves and the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation of zonal flow in the equatorial stratosphere J Atmos Sci 71 2878-2885
[5]  
Thompson DWJ(2016)Feeling the pulse of the stratosphere: an emerging opportunity for predicting continental-scale cold air outbreaks one month in advance Bull Am Meteorol Soc 97 1475-1489
[6]  
Timothy JD(2007)A new look at stratospheric sudden warmings: Part I: climatology and modelling benchmark J Clim 20 449-469
[7]  
Andrew JC(2005)Downward propagation and statistical forecast of the near-surface weather J Geophys Res 110 D14104-819
[8]  
Alan O(2000)Summary of the 1998 workshop on mesoscale model verification Bull Am Meteorol Soc 81 809-1022
[9]  
Cai M(1979)Lanczos filtering in one and two dimensions J Appl Meteorol 18 1016-64
[10]  
Shin CS(2008)Fuzzy verification of high-resolution gridded forecasts: a review and proposed framework Meteorol Appl 15 51-1447