Comparison of GIS-based surrogate weighting methods for multi-directional landfill site selection in West Mediterranean Planning Region in Turkey

被引:0
作者
Mehmet Ali Dereli
Emre Tercan
机构
[1] Giresun University,Department of Geomatics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering
[2] General Directorate of Highways,Department of Survey, Project and Environment, 13th Region
来源
Environment, Development and Sustainability | 2021年 / 23卷
关键词
Municipal solid waste; Multi-directional landfill site; Weighted linear combination; GIS; Regional planning; Subjective weighting;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
On account of sustainable municipal solid waste (MSW) management, the determination of appropriate positions for MSW multi-directional landfill sites includes thought of geomorphological, topographical, hydrological, monetary and environmental parameters. Deciding these regions in a manner that limits ecological contamination and well-being dangers is a significant multi-criteria decision-making issue in the controls of land executives. A landfill site choice procedure has been completed utilizing three pure weighting techniques (rank sum, rank reciprocal and rank-order centroid) coordinated with geographical information system instruments. The outcomes demonstrate that 32,045 km2 (87.4%) of the total area is inadmissible for landfill sites. This study compares the results of three subjective weighting methods at a large-scale regional planning scenario. The exhibited methodology helps chiefs in deciding safe areas for MSW landfill sites. The results show that in the early period of the spatial planning, simplified pure methods can be adequate. In this case, using more complicated methods will not definitely deduce different findings. However, when regional planning requires identifying the spatial scope of the favored specific sites, considering the intersection area proposed by three methods will be ideal.
引用
收藏
页码:3438 / 3457
页数:19
相关论文
共 134 条
[31]  
El Baghdadi M(2018)Municipal solid waste landfill siting by using GIS and analytical hierarchy process (AHP): A case study in Qom city, Iran Environmental Earth Sciences 77 52-718
[32]  
Touhami F(1985)Ranking with partial information: A method and an application Operations Research 33 38-669
[33]  
Barron FH(1951)A statistical approach to some basic mine valuation problems on the Witwatersrand Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy 52 119-33
[34]  
Barrett BE(2000)On the use of weighted linear combination method in GIS: Common and best practice approaches Transactions in GIS 4 5-494
[35]  
Barron FH(2014)Dominance intensity measuring methods in MCDM with ordinal relations regarding weights Knowledge-Based Systems 70 26-77
[36]  
Barrett BE(2016)Landslide vulnerability mapping (LVM) using weighted linear combination (WLC) model through remote sensing and GIS techniques Modeling Earth Systems and Environment 2 88-379
[37]  
Basse RM(2013)Determining the most suitable areas for artificial groundwater recharge via an integrated PROMETHEE II-AHP method in GIS environment (case study: Garabaygan Basin, Iran) Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 185 707-899
[38]  
Charif O(2018)Applications of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and analytical network process (ANP) for industrial site selections in Isfahan, Iran Environmental Earth Sciences 77 537-undefined
[39]  
Bodis K(2018)Evaluation of sustainable supply chain risk management using an integrated fuzzy TOPSIS–CRITIC approach Journal of Cleaner Production 175 651-undefined
[40]  
Berndt C(2013)Rank ordering criteria weighting methods—A comparative overview Optimum Studia Ekonomiczne 5 14-undefined