Development of an observational instrument to determine variations in the patient care process and patient flow among emergency physicians and internists at the emergency department

被引：3

作者：

Koks D.R.J.C. ^{[1
]}

Zonderland M.E. ^{[2
]}

Heringhaus C. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Emergency Department, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, Albinusdreef 2

[2] Stochastic Operations Research and Center for Healthcare Operations Improvement and Research, University of Twente, 7500 AE Enschede

来源：

International Journal of Emergency Medicine | / 6卷 / 1期

关键词：

Emergency department; Emergency physicians; Internists; Length of stay; Patient care process; Patient flow;

D O I：

10.1186/1865-1380-6-1

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Background: The increasing demand for acute care and restructuring of hospitals resulting in emergency department (ED) closures and fewer inpatient beds are reasons to improve ED efficiency. The approach towards the patient care process varies among doctors. The objective of this study was to determine variations in the patient care process and patient flow among emergency physicians (EP's) and internists at the ED of Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC), the Netherlands. Methods: An observational instrument was developed during a pilot study at the LUMC ED, following observations of activities performed by EP's and internists. The instrument divides all different types of activities a clinician can perform on the ED into eight categories. Using the observational instrument, their activities were observed and registered for 10 separate days. Primary outcomes were defined as the time spend on the eight separate activity categories, the total length of stay (LOS) and the number of patients seen during an interval. Secondary outcomes were general observations of working routine features that determine patient flow at the ED. The obtained data were analyzed into SPSS. Results: Ten doctors were observed during a total of ± 36 hours in which 42 patients were seen. Although EP's were observed for a shorter period of time than internists (13:48 vs. 22:10 hrs, -38%), they saw more patients (26 vs. 16, +62%). EP's tended to spend a higher proportion of their time on patient contact than internists (27.2% vs.17.3%, p = 0.06). Both groups dedicated the highest proportion of their time to documentation (31.5% and 33.4%,p = 0.75) and had little communication with ED nurses (3.7% and 2.4% p = 0.57). The average LOS of internal patients was higher than that of EP's patients (5.25 ± sd 1:33 and 2.26 ± sd 1:32 hours). Internists occupied more treatment rooms at the same time (2.41 vs. 2.08, p < 0.00) and followed a more sequential working routine. Conclusions: This paper describes the determination of variations in the ED care process and patient flow among EP's and internists by an observational instrument. A pilot study with the instrument showed variations in the patient care process and patient flow among the two groups at the LUMC ED. © 2013 Koks et al.

引用

共 7 条

[1]

Guttmann A., Schull M.J., Vermeulen M.J., Stukel T.A., Association between waiting times and short term mortality and hospital admission after departure from emergency department: Population based cohort study from Ontario, Canada, Br Med J, 342, (2011)

[2]

Hoot N.R., Aronsky D., Systematic review of emergency department crowding: Causes, effects, and solutions, Ann Emerg Med, 52, pp. 126-136, (2008)

[3]

Huang Q., Thind A., Dreyer J.F., Zaric G.S., The impact of delays to admission from the emergency department on inpatient outcomes, BioMed Central Emergency Medicine, 10, (2010)

[4]

Moskop J.C., Sklar D.P., Geiderman J.M., Schears R.M., Bookman K.J., Emergency department crowding, part 1 - Concept, causes, and moral consequences, Ann Emerg Med, 53, pp. 605-611, (2009)

[5]

Schull M.J., Szalai J.-P., Schwartz B., Redelmeier D.A., Emergency department overcrowding following systematic hospital restructuring: Trends at twenty hospitals over ten years, Academic Emergency Medicine, 8, 11, pp. 1037-1043, (2001)

[6]

Differences between the emergency department, the office, and the inpatient setting, Emergency Medicine Clerkship Primer, A Manual for Medical Students, pp. 13-16, (2008)

[7]

Van Der Wulp I., Van Baar M.E., Schrijvers A.J.P., Reliability and validity of the Manchester Triage System a general emergency department patient population in the Netherlands: Results of a simulation study, Emergency Medicine Journal, 25, 7, pp. 431-434, (2008)

← 1 →