How to standardize the measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction

被引:0
作者
Kenya Kusunose
Robert Zheng
Hirotsugu Yamada
Masataka Sata
机构
[1] Tokushima University Hospital,Department of Cardiovascular Medicine
[2] Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences,Department of Community Medicine for Cardiology
来源
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics | 2022年 / 49卷
关键词
Ejection fraction; Artificial intelligence; Echocardiography; Machine learning;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Despite recent advances in imaging for myocardial deformation, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is still the most important index for systolic function in daily practice. Its role in multiple fields (e.g., valvular heart disease, myocardial infarction, cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction) has been a mainstay in guidelines. In addition, assessment of LVEF is vital to clinical decision-making in patients with heart failure. However, notable limitations to LVEF include poor inter-observer reproducibility dependent on observer skill, poor acoustic windows, and variations in measurement techniques. To solve these problems, methods for standardization of LVEF by sharing reference images among observers and artificial intelligence for accurate measurements have been developed. In this review, we focus on the standardization of LVEF using reference images and automated LVEF using artificial intelligence.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 43
页数:8
相关论文
共 97 条
[1]  
Izumi C(2020)JCS/JSCS/JATS/JSVS 2020 guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease Circ J 84 2037-2119
[2]  
Eishi K(2017)ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2017 appropriate use criteria for multimodality imaging in valvular heart disease: a report of the American college of cardiology appropriate use criteria task force, American association for thoracic surgery, American heart association, american society of echocardiography, American society of nuclear cardiology, heart rhythm society, society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions, society of cardiovascular computed tomography,
[3]  
Ashihara K(2016)Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography: an update from the american society of echocardiography and the european association of cardiovascular imaging J Am Soc Echocardiogr 29 277-314
[4]  
Doherty JU(2019)JCS 2017/JHFS 2017 guideline on diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure—digest version Circ J 83 2084-2184
[5]  
Kort S(2019)A Practical guide to assess the reproducibility of echocardiographic measurements J Am Soc Echocardiogr 32 1505-1515
[6]  
Mehran R(2020)Steps to use artificial intelligence in echocardiography J Echocardiogr 72 1859-1866
[7]  
Nagueh SF(2008)Normal values of echocardiographic parameters in relation to age in a healthy Japanese population: the JAMP study Circ J 76 1177-1181
[8]  
Smiseth OA(2012)Normal values of real-time 3-dimensional echocardiographic parameters in a healthy Japanese population: the JAMP-3D Study Circ J 28 1-39 e14
[9]  
Appleton CP(2015)Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging J Am Soc Echocardiogr 26 607-616
[10]  
Tsutsui H(2005)Assessment of systolic left ventricular function: a multi-centre comparison of cineventriculography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, unenhanced and contrast-enhanced echocardiography Eur Heart J 9 777-783