Paradigm for an Evolutionary Process

[1] Questions of the Day and of the Fray, did not cease publication till 1924 (?)

[2] and the anti-Mendelian influence was strong enough to ensure that Fisher’s first major genetical paper, arguing amongst other things that continuous variation is explicable on Mendelian principles, was rejected by the Royal Society of London, and published by the less prestigeful Royal Society of Edinburgh, (1918)

[3] Wright S., Stochastic processes in evolution, In Stochastic Models in Biology and Medicine, (1964)

[4] Levins R., Amer.Nat., 96, (1962)

[5] MacArthur H.H., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. Wash, 48, (1962)

[6] Slobotkin L.B., Am. Sci, 52, (1964)

[7] Waddington C.H., The Nature of Life (Allen and Unwin 1961), Prolegomena, pp. 109-122, (1967)

[8] Hutchinson G.E., Amer. Nat, 93, (1959)

[9] Green M.M., Proc. 11th Int. Cong, Genet, 2, (1965)

[10] The Genetics of Colonising Species, IUBS Symposium, (1965)

[1] Questions of the Day and of the Fray, did not cease publication till 1924 (?)

[2] and the anti-Mendelian influence was strong enough to ensure that Fisher’s first major genetical paper, arguing amongst other things that continuous variation is explicable on Mendelian principles, was rejected by the Royal Society of London, and published by the less prestigeful Royal Society of Edinburgh, (1918)

[3] Wright S., Stochastic processes in evolution, In Stochastic Models in Biology and Medicine, (1964)

[4] Levins R., Amer.Nat., 96, (1962)

[5] MacArthur H.H., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. Wash, 48, (1962)

[6] Slobotkin L.B., Am. Sci, 52, (1964)

[7] Waddington C.H., The Nature of Life (Allen and Unwin 1961), Prolegomena, pp. 109-122, (1967)

[8] Hutchinson G.E., Amer. Nat, 93, (1959)

[9] Green M.M., Proc. 11th Int. Cong, Genet, 2, (1965)

[10] The Genetics of Colonising Species, IUBS Symposium, (1965)