Aggregate IND Safety Reporting for Smaller Companies and Programs

被引:0
作者
Greg Ball
Mengchun Li
Jim Buchanan
Barbara Hendrickson
Richard C. Zink
Steve Snapinn
Jay Herson
机构
[1] ASAPprocess,
[2] TB Alliance,undefined
[3] Covilance,undefined
[4] University of Chicago,undefined
[5] Lexitas Pharma Services,undefined
[6] Seattle-Quilcene Biostatistics,undefined
[7] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health,undefined
来源
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science | 2024年 / 58卷
关键词
Aggregate safety assessments; Safety topics of interest; Scientific evaluation of safety data; Aggregate IND safety reporting; Safety surveillance plan; Safety assessment committee;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Investigational New Drug (IND) Final Rule (US FDA, Final rule: Investigational new drug safety reporting requirements for human drug and biological products and safety reporting requirements for bioavailability and bioequivalence studies in humans, 2010) applies to all human drugs and biological products being studied under an IND. The Final Rule specifies that a sponsor must file an IND safety report for any Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction (SUSAR) of a medicinal product being investigated. To make a proper SUSAR classification, sponsors need to go beyond conventional Data Monitoring Committees (DMCs) with an interdisciplinary effort, using all relevant data (including data outside clinical trials), to make judgments on the possibility of serious adverse events being caused by the study drug—rather than the underlying condition of the patient or a concomitant therapy. Ball et al. (Ball et al. in Ther Innov Regul Sci 55:705–716, 2021) have reported on how the Final Rule has been implemented by large pharmaceutical companies. This paper explores the experiences of small sponsor companies regarding the Final Rule, to understand the current challenges that they have been facing to meet aggregate IND safety reporting requirements.
引用
收藏
页码:368 / 379
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Ball G(2021)Interdisciplinary safety evaluation for learning and decision-making Ther Innov Regul Sci 55 705-716
[2]  
Hendrickson BA(2020)Global regulatory landscape for aggregate safety assessments: recent developments and future directions Ther Innov Regul Sci 54 447-461
[3]  
Freedman AL(2015)The FDA's final rule on expedited safety reporting: statistical considerations Stat Biopharm Res 7 174-190
[4]  
Gordon R(2014)Optimizing expedited safety reporting for drugs and biologics subject to an investigational new drug application Ther Innov Regul Sci 48 200-207
[5]  
Ball G(2017)Sponsors’ and investigative staffs’ perceptions of the current investigational new drug safety reporting process in oncology trials Clin Trials 14 225-233
[6]  
Kurek R(2022)Using BDRIBS to support the decision to refer an event to a safety assessment committee for unblinded evaluation Pharm Stat 21 372-385
[7]  
Hendrickson BA(2018)Specialized safety needs for small and midsize companies Appl Clin Trials 27 18-21
[8]  
Wittes J(2011)Continuous safety monitoring for randomized controlled clinical trials with blinded treatment information: ethical considerations Contemp Clin Trials 32 S2-S17
[9]  
Crowe B(2016)A Bayesian exposure-time method for clinical trial safety monitoring with blinded data Ther Innov Regul Sci 50 833-845
[10]  
Chuang-Stein C(2020)Bayesian meta-analysis of safety outcomes using blinded clinical trial data Clin Trials 54 1557-1565