Measuring urban sprawl in Beijing with geo-spatial indices

被引:0
作者
Fang Jiang
Shenghe Liu
Hong Yuan
Qing Zhang
机构
[1] CAS,Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research
[2] Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,undefined
来源
Journal of Geographical Sciences | 2007年 / 17卷
关键词
urban sprawl; measurement; geo-spatial indices; Beijing;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Concerning about the rapid urban growth in recent China, this study takes Beijing as a case and puts forward that urban sprawl can be measured from spatial configuration, urban growth efficiency and external impacts, and then develops a geo-spatial indices system for measuring sprawl, a total of 13 indicators. In order to calculate these indices, different sources data are selected, including land use maps, former land use planning, land price and floor-area-ratio samples, digitized map of the highways and city centers, population and GDP statistical data, etc. Various GIS spatial analysis methods are used to spatialize these indices into 100m × 100m cells. Besides, an integrated urban sprawl index is calculated by weight sum of these 13 indices. The application result indicates that geo-spatial indices system can capture most of the typical features and interior differentia of urban sprawl. Construction land in Beijing has kept fast growing with large amount, low efficiency and disordered spatial configuration, indicating a typical sprawling tendency. The following specific sprawl features are identified by each indicator: (1) typical spatial configuration of sprawling: obvious fragmentation and irregularity of landscape due to unsuccessful enforcement of land use planning, unadvisable pattern of typical discontinuous development, strip development and leapfrog development; (2) low efficiency of sprawl: low development density, low population density and economic output in newly developed area; and (3) negative impacts on agriculture, environment and city life. According to the integrated sprawl index, the sprawling amount in the northern part is larger than that in the southern, but the sprawling extent is in converse case; most sprawling area include the marginal area of the near suburbs and the area between highways, etc. Four sprawling patterns are identified: randomly expansion at urban fringe, strip development along or between highways, scattered development of industrial land, leapfrog development of urban residence and industrial area.
引用
收藏
页码:469 / 478
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Burchell R. W.(1999)The evolution of the sprawl debate in the United States West Northwest 5 137-160
  • [2] Shad N. A.(2005)Urban expansion and its driving force analysis using romote sensed data: A case of Xiamen City Economic Geography 25 79-83
  • [3] Chen B.(2004)Research on spatial differentiation of urban growth using multi-temporal landsat thematic mapper satellite remote sensing images Journal of China Coal Society 29 308-312
  • [4] Xu H.(1998)How America’s cities are growing: The Big Picture Brookings Review 16 8-12
  • [5] Chen L.(1997)Is Los Angeles-style sprawl desirable? Journal of the American Planning Association 63 107-126
  • [6] Guo D.(2003)City expansion model of metropolitan area in China: A case study of Beijing Acta Geographica Sinica 58 294-304
  • [7] Hu Z.(2006)Urban sprawl pattern and spatial features of Urümqi City during the last 15 years Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology 28 364-370
  • [8] Downs A.(2003)Land resource impact indicators of urban sprawl Applied Geography 23 159-175
  • [9] Ewing R.(2000)Comparing states with and without growth management analysis based on indicators with policy implications comment Land Use Policy 17 349-355
  • [10] He C.(2000)Beijing urban land growth pattern based on GIS analysis Acta Geographica Sinica 55 407-416