The Self-Perception and Relationships Tool (S-PRT): A novel approach to the measurement of subjective health-related quality of life

被引：12
作者：
Atkinson M.J. [1 ,2 ]
Wishart P.M. [3 ,4 ]
Wasil B.I. [5 ]
Robinson J.W. [6 ,7 ]
机构：
[1] Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.
[2] Pfizer Inc., San Diego, CA
[3] Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.
[4] Spirituality Research Institute Inc., Calgary, Alta.
[5] Dept. of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.
[6] Department of Oncology, Program in Clinical Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.
[7] Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alta.
来源：
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | / 2卷 / 1期
关键词：
Spiritual Experience; Pool Variance; Patient Generate Index; Mental Health Scale; Personal Construct Theory;
D O I：
10.1186/1477-7525-2-36
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Background: The Self-Perception and Relationships Tool (S-PRT) is intended to be a clinically responsive and holistic assessment of patients' experience of illness and subjective Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL). Methods: A diversity of patients were involved in two phases of this study. Patient samples included individuals involved with renal, cardiology, psychiatric, cancer, chronic pelvic pain, and sleep services. In Phase I, five patient focus groups generated 128 perceptual rating scales. These scales described important characteristics of illness-related experience within six life domains (i.e., Physical, Mental-Emotional, Interpersonal Receptiveness, Interpersonal Contribution, Transpersonal Receptiveness and Transpersonal Orientation). Item reduction was accomplished using Importance Q-sort and Importance Checklist methodologies with 150 patients across the participating services. In Phase II, a refined item pool (88 items) was administered along with measures of health status (SF-36) and spiritual beliefs (Spiritual Involvements and Beliefs Scale - SIBS) to 160 patients, of these 136 patients returned complete response sets. Results: Factor analysis of S-PRT results produced a surprisingly clean five-factor solution (Eigen values> 2.0 explaining 73.5% of the pooled variance). Items with weaker or split loadings were removed leaving 36 items to form the final S-PRT rating scales; Intrapersonal Well-being (physical, mental & emotional items), Interpersonal Receptivity, Interpersonal Contribution, Transpersonal Receptivity and Transpersonal Orientation (Eigen values> 5.4 explaining 83.5% of the pooled variance). The internal consistency (Cronbach's Alpha) of these scales was very high (0.82-0.97). Good convergent correlations (0.40 to 0.67) were observed between the S-PRT scales and the Mental Health scales of the SF-36. Correlations between the S-PRT Intrapersonal Well-being scale and three of SF-36 Physical Health scales were moderate (0.30 to 0.46). The criterion-related validity of the S-PRT spiritual scales was supported by moderate convergence (0.40-0.49) with three SIBS scales. Conclusion: Evidence supports the validity of the S-PRT as a generally applicable measure of perceived health status and HRQL. The test-retest reliability was found to be adequate for most scales, and there is some preliminary evidence that the S-PRT is responsive to patient-reported changes in determinants of their HRQL. Clinical uses and directions for future research are discussed. © 2004 Atkinson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
页数：15
相关论文
共 71 条
[51]  
Willson P., McNamara J.R., How perceptions of a simulated physician-patient interaction influence intended satisfaction and compliance, Soc., Sci. Med., 16, pp. 1699-1704, (1982)
[52]  
Derrickson P.E., Instruments used to measure change in students preparing for ministry: A summary of research on clinical pastoral education students, J. Pastoral Care, 44, pp. 343-356, (1990)
[53]  
Crawford W.R., Attitudinal and perceptual shifts of nurse practitioners toward their new professional role, Research Memorandum, 18, (1976)
[54]  
Morrison James K., Heeder R., Follow-up study of psychotherapeutically-induced change in clients' constructs of self, Psychological Reports, 59, pp. 537-538, (1986)
[55]  
Mohl P.C., Martinez D., Ticknor C., Huang M., Cordell L., Early dropouts from psychotherapy, J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 179, pp. 478-481, (1991)
[56]  
Speca M., Robinson J.W., Goodey E., Frizzell B., Patients evaluate a quality of life scale: Whose life is it anyway?, Cancer Pract., 2, pp. 365-370, (1994)
[57]  
McHorney C.A., Ware J.E., Lu J.F., Sherbourne C.D., The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups, Med. Care, 32, pp. 40-66, (1994)
[58]  
McHorney C.A., Ware J.E., Raczek A.E., The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs, Med. Care, 31, pp. 247-263, (1993)
[59]  
Ware J.E., Sherbourne C.D., The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection, Med. Care, 30, pp. 473-483, (1992)
[60]  
Ware J.E., Kosinski M., Dewey J.E., How to score Version 2 of the SF-36 Health Survey (Standard and Acute Forms), (2000)
12345678