Unitarity of black hole evaporation in final-state projection models

被引:0
作者
Seth Lloyd
John Preskill
机构
[1] MIT,Department of Mechanical Engineering
[2] Institute for Quantum Information and Matter,undefined
[3] Caltech,undefined
来源
Journal of High Energy Physics | / 2014卷
关键词
Black Holes; Spacetime Singularities;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Almheiri et al. have emphasized that otherwise reasonable beliefs about black hole evaporation are incompatible with the monogamy of quantum entanglement, a general property of quantum mechanics. We investigate the final-state projection model of black hole evaporation proposed by Horowitz and Maldacena, pointing out that this model admits cloning of quantum states and polygamous entanglement, allowing unitarity of the evaporation process to be reconciled with smoothness of the black hole event horizon. Though the model seems to require carefully tuned dynamics to ensure exact unitarity of the black hole S-matrix, for a generic final-state boundary condition the deviations from unitarity are exponentially small in the black hole entropy; furthermore observers inside black holes need not detect any deviations from standard quantum mechanics. Though measurements performed inside old black holes could potentially produce causality-violating phenomena, the computational complexity of decoding the Hawking radiation may render the causality violation unobservable. Final-state projection models illustrate how inviolable principles of standard quantum mechanics might be circumvented in a theory of quantum gravity.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 86 条
  • [1] Hawking SW(1974)Black hole explosions Nature 248 30-undefined
  • [2] Hawking SW(1976)Breakdown of predictability in gravitational collapse Phys. Rev. D 14 2460-undefined
  • [3] Susskind L(1993)The stretched horizon and black hole complementarity Phys. Rev. D 48 3743-undefined
  • [4] Thorlacius L(1994)Gedanken experiments involving black holes Phys. Rev. D 49 966-undefined
  • [5] Uglum J(1995)The world as a hologram J. Math. Phys. 36 6377-undefined
  • [6] Susskind L(2013)Black holes: complementarity or firewalls? JHEP 02 062-undefined
  • [7] Thorlacius L(1993)Average entropy of a subsystem Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 1291-undefined
  • [8] Susskind L(2004)Is entanglement monogamous? IBM J. Res. Dev. 48 71-undefined
  • [9] Almheiri A(2004)Monogamy of quantum entanglement and other correlations Phys. Rev. A 69 022309-undefined
  • [10] Marolf D(2009)The information paradox: a pedagogical introduction Class. Quant. Grav. 26 224001-undefined