Laparoscopic and robotic surgical training in urology

被引:16
作者
András Hoznek
Ran Katz
Matthew Gettman
Laurent Salomon
Patrick Antiphon
Alexandre de la Taille
René Yiou
Dominique Chopin
Clément-Claude Abbou
机构
[1] Service d’Urologie CHU Henri Mondor, 51 Av Du Ml De Lattre de Tassigny, Créteil
关键词
Laparoscopic Instrument; Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy; Laparoscopic Skill; Radical Prostatectomy; Virtual Reality;
D O I
10.1007/s11934-003-0040-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The most important change in urology during the past decade was the development of minimally invasive surgery, particularly laparoscopy. However, the main drawback of laparoscopy is a steep learning curve, which results from the significant changes in the surgical environment. Although laparoscopy can provide important advantages for the patient, including decreased length of hospitalization, decreased analgesic requirement, and a shortened postoperative convalescence, one concern has been whether laparoscopic techniques should be learned solely in the operating room. For example, sports, music, and aviation are practiced before an actual performance is ever undertaken. In this review, the advantages and limitations of all available training modalities in minimally invasive surgery are described. Testing basic laparoscopic skills on inanimate models, becoming familiar with the principles of dissection and hemostasis on living animals, and studying surgical anatomy on cadavers should be considered as indispensable and complementary elements for laparoscopic training in the future. In addition, telementoring with the help of modern image processing and virtual reality eventually may become the basis of tomorrow’s surgical instruction. © 2003, Current Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 137
页数:7
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Guillonneau B., Abbou C.C., Doublet J.D., Et al., Proposal for a “European scoring system for laparoscopic operations in urology, Eur Urol, 40, pp. 2-6, (2001)
[2]  
Guillonneau B., Rozet F., Cathelineau X., Et al., Perioperative complications of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris 3-year experience, J Urol, 167, pp. 51-56, (2002)
[3]  
Gill I.S., Zippe C.D., Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: technique, Urol Clin North Am, 28, pp. 423-436, (2001)
[4]  
Tevaearai H.T., Mueller X.M., von Segesser L.K., 3-D vision improves performance in a pelvic trainer, Endoscopy, 32, pp. 464-468, (2000)
[5]  
Rassweiler J., Binder J., Frede T., Robotic and telesurgery: Will they change our future?, Curr Opin Urol, 11, pp. 309-320, (2001)
[6]  
Summers A.N., Rinehart G.C., Simpson D., Redlich P.N., Acquisition of surgical skills: a randomized trial of didactic, videotape, and computer-based training, Surgery, 126, pp. 330-336, (1999)
[7]  
Medina M., Formidable challenges to teaching advanced laparoscopic skills, JSLS, 5, pp. 153-158, (2001)
[8]  
Sreenivas V.I., Pothula V., Videolaparoscopy in general surgery: an update, N C Med J, 62, pp. 205-209, (2001)
[9]  
Melvin W.S., Johnson J.A., Ellison E.C., Laparoscopic skills enhancement, Am J Surg, 172, pp. 377-379, (1996)
[10]  
Laguna M.P., Hatzinger M., Rassweiler J., Simulators and endourological training, Curr Opin Urol, 12, pp. 205-209, (2002)