Quantifying site-specific chromatin mechanics and DNA damage response

被引:0
作者
Daniel B. Whitefield
Stephen T. Spagnol
Travis J. Armiger
Li Lan
Kris Noel Dahl
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon University,Department of Biomedical Engineering
[2] Carnegie Mellon University,Department of Chemical Engineering
[3] University of Pittsburgh Medical Center,Hillman Cancer Center
来源
Scientific Reports | / 8卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
DNA double-strand breaks pose a direct threat to genomic stability. Studies of DNA damage and chromatin dynamics have yielded opposing results that support either increased or decreased chromatin motion after damage. In this study, we independently measure the dynamics of transcriptionally active or repressed chromatin regions using particle tracking microrheology. We find that the baseline motion of transcriptionally repressed regions of chromatin are significantly less mobile than transcriptionally active chromatin, which is statistically similar to the bulk motion of chromatin within the nucleus. Site specific DNA damage using KillerRed tags induced in loci within repressed chromatin causes an increased motion, while loci within transcriptionally active regions remains unchanged at similar time scales. We also observe a time-dependent response associated with a further increase in chromatin decondensation. Global induction of damage with bleocin displays similar trends of chromatin decondensation and increased mobility only at 53BP1-labeled damage sites but not at non-damaged sites, indicating that chromatin dynamics are tightly regulated locally after damage. These results shed light on the evolution of the local and global DNA damage response associated with chromatin remodeling and dynamics, with direct implications for their role in repair.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [1] Luger K(2012)New insights into nucleosome and chromatin structure: an ordered state or a disordered affair? Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Bio. 13 436-447
  • [2] Dechassa ML(2014)Active cytoskeletal force and chromatin condensation independently modulate intranuclear network fluctuations Int. Bio. 6 523-531
  • [3] Tremethick DJ(2013)Micron-scale coherence in interphase chromatin dynamics Pnas 110 15555-15560
  • [4] Spagnol ST(2017)ChromEMT: visualizing 3D chromatin structure and compaction in interphase and mitotic cells Science 357 1-13
  • [5] Dahl KN(2014)Novel method for site-specific induction of oxidative DNA damage reveals differences in recruitment of repair proteins to heterochromatin and euchromatin Nuc. Acids Res. 42 2330-45
  • [6] Zidovska A(2012)Force-induced changes in subnuclear movement and rheology Biophys. J. 103 2423-2431
  • [7] Weitz DA(2015)Chemical proteomics reveals a γH2AX-53BP1 interaction in the DNA damage response Nat. Chem. Biol. 11 807-814
  • [8] Mitchison TJ(2015)Nuclear GIT2 is an ATM substrate and promotes DNA repair Mol. Cell. Bio. 35 1081-1096
  • [9] Ou HD(2003)Xeroderma pigmentosum group A protein loads as a separate factor onto DNA lesions Mol. Cell Biol. 23 5755-5767
  • [10] Lan L(2006)Changes in chromatin structure and mobility in living cells at sites of DNA double-strand breaks J. Cell Biol. 172 823-834