Examining various variables related to authentic learning self-efficacy of university students in educational online social networks: Creative self-efficacy, rational experiential thinking, and cognitive flexibility

被引:0
作者
Hatice Yildiz Durak
机构
[1] Bartin University,Faculty of Science, Department of Computer Technology and Information Systems
来源
Current Psychology | 2023年 / 42卷
关键词
Authentic learning self-efficacy; Creative self-efficacy; Rational experiential thinking; Cognitive flexibility; University students;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study is to examine the relationships between creative self-efficacy (CSE), rational experiential thinking, and cognitive flexibility thinking skills, and authentic learning self-efficacy (ALSE) as a result of authentic learning (AL) activities in educational online social networks. The participants of the research are 102 university students. The study group was determined by a convenient sampling method. Variance-based PLS-SEM using partial least square was used to examine the relationships between research variables. According to the research findings, it is seen that cognitive flexibility in online social networks has a significant effect on experiential ability and rational favorability. Findings show that rational favorability has a positive and significant effect on CSE. Research findings indicate that personal variables such as gender, age, and academic success perception do not have a significant effect on CSE in learning that takes place in online social networks. It was evaluated whether CSE has an effect on online ALSE, and it was found that other sub-dimensions other than “keeping up with technological advancements” are significant.
引用
收藏
页码:22093 / 22102
页数:9
相关论文
共 96 条
  • [1] Alper A(2008)The Effect of cognitive flexibility on students’ achievement and attitudes in web mediated problem based learning Education and Science 33 49-16
  • [2] Deryakulu D(2020)Exploring the role of social media in collaborative learning the new domain of learning Smart Learning Environments 7 1-097
  • [3] Ansari JAN(2020)Adaptation of creative self-efficacy scale into Turkish language World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues 12 084-558
  • [4] Khan NA(1979)Are the important “individual differences” between or within individuals? Journal of Research in Personality 13 546-534
  • [5] Atabek O(2012)Implementing Web 2.0 technologies in higher education: A collective case study Computers & Education 59 524-446
  • [6] Batting WT(2008)Individual differences in processing styles: Validity of the rational–experiential inventory Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 49 439-346
  • [7] Bennett S(2021)Efficacy of social networking sites for sustainable education in the era of COVID-19: A systematic review Sustainability 13 808-1413
  • [8] Bishop A(2014)The validity and reliability of the cognitive flexibility scale Education and Science 39 339-278
  • [9] Dalgarno B(2014)Core self-evaluation and workplace creativity Journalof Business Research 67 1405-778
  • [10] Waycott J(2008)Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition Annual Review of Psychology 59 255-433