The usage of biological DMARDs and clinical remission of rheumatoid arthritis in China: a real-world large scale study

被引:0
作者
Yuan An
Tian Liu
Dongyi He
Lijun Wu
Juan Li
Yi Liu
Liqi Bi
Bin Zhou
Changsong Lin
Lan He
Xiangyuan Liu
Xiaofeng Li
Niansheng Yang
Zhuoli Zhang
Hui Song
Wei Wei
Jing Liu
Yu Bi
Zhanguo Li
机构
[1] Peking University People’s Hospital,Department of Rheumatology and Immunology
[2] Shanghai Guanghua Hospital,Department of Rheumatology
[3] People’s Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region,Department of Rheumatology
[4] Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University,Department of Rheumatology
[5] Sichuan University,Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, West China Hospital, West China School of Medicine
[6] China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University,Department of Rheumatology
[7] Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital,Department of Rheumatology
[8] The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine University,Department of Rheumatology
[9] The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’An Jiaotong University,Department of Rheumatology
[10] Peking University Third Hospital,Department of Rheumatology
[11] The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University,Department of Rheumatology
[12] The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University,Department of Rheumatology
[13] Peking University First Hospital,Department of Rheumatology
[14] Beijing Jishuitan Hospital,Department of Rheumatology
[15] Tianjin Medical University General Hospital,Department of Rheumatology
[16] Shanghai Roche Pharmaceuticals Ltd,undefined
来源
Clinical Rheumatology | 2017年 / 36卷
关键词
Biological; China; DMARD; Duration; Rheumatoid arthritis; Therapy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aims of this study are to characterize the biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) usage patterns in real-life and examine the remission rate of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients receiving bDMARDs in routine clinical practice in China. Consenting RA patients (≥18 years) from 15 teaching hospitals and receiving marketed bDMARDs were included. In total, 802 patients (81.3 % women, 49.0 ± 13.9 years) were included; 89.5 % were receiving a combination of bDMARDs and conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDS), whereas 10.5 % were receiving bDMARD monotherapy. Etanercept (including Enbrel® and local brand Yi Sai Pu® and Qiangke®), tocilizumab, adalimumab, and infliximab were used by 66.6 %, 17.0 %, 7.5 %, and 6.6 % patients, respectively. Etanercept was used at a mean weekly dose of 38.2 ± 15.6 mg for 25.5 ± 47.0 weeks and tocilizumab at 94.5 ± 21.9 mg for 4.7 ± 7.5 weeks. Overall rate of remission was 12.6 %, 5.4 % , and 3.5 % based on DAS28, CDAI, and SDAI scores, respectively. Compared with patients receiving bDMARDs for <3 months, those receiving bDMARDs for ≥3 months exhibited significantly lower DAS28 scores (p < 0.0001), and a significantly higher proportion of patients who received bDMARDs for ≥12 months achieved the treatment goal (remission or low disease activity, 62.5 % vs. 18.3 %, p < 0.0001). Patients receiving combination therapy with csDMARDs exhibited lower DAS28 scores than patients receiving bDMARD monotherapy (4.3 vs. 4.8, p = 0.011). This large-scale real-world study showed that bDMARD usage patterns in routine clinical practice in China were in accordance with international guidelines for RA management despite the short treatment duration. Longer duration of bDMARD usage and combination therapy showed a favored outcome of RA.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 43
页数:8
相关论文
共 119 条
[1]  
Cross M(2014)The global burden of rheumatoid arthritis: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study Ann Rheum Dis 73 1316-1322
[2]  
Smith E(2003)Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions Bull World Health Organ 81 646-656
[3]  
Hoy D(2012)Epidemiology of eight common rheumatic diseases in China: a large-scale cross-sectional survey in Beijing Rheumatology (Oxford) 51 721-729
[4]  
Woolf AD(2008)Rheumatic diseases in China Arthritis Res Ther 10 R17-1487
[5]  
Pfleger B(2015)The impact of rheumatoid arthritis on work capacity in Chinese patients: a cross-sectional study Rheumatology (Oxford) 54 1478-317
[6]  
Li R(2015)A new look at rheumatology in China--opportunities and challenges Nat Rev Rheumatol 11 313-531
[7]  
Sun J(2014)Societal costs of rheumatoid arthritis in China: a hospital-based cross-sectional study Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 66 523-306
[8]  
Ren LM(1994)Prevalence of rheumatic diseases in Taiwan: a population study of urban, suburban, rural differences J Rheumatol 21 302-509
[9]  
Zeng QY(2014)EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2013 update Ann Rheum Dis 73 492-639
[10]  
Chen R(2012)2012 Update of the 2008 American College of Rheumatology recommendations for the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biologic agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 64 625-1904