A principled governance for emerging AI regimes: lessons from China, the European Union, and the United States

被引:0
作者
Ren Bin Lee Dixon
机构
[1] Hubert H. Humphrey School of Public Affairs,
来源
AI and Ethics | 2023年 / 3卷 / 3期
关键词
Artificial Intelligence; AI Principles; Governance; Policies; China; United States; European Union;
D O I
10.1007/s43681-022-00205-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Artificial intelligence (AI) governance is anticipated to have a transformative impact on humanity which has prompted researchers to analyze its implementation and use to ensure that the technology advances ethically and is beneficial for society. Though countries have begun to develop governance initiatives to regulate AI, the number of emerging AI regimes with an established structure is still relatively low. Meanwhile, the technology is advancing rapidly and has already caused harm inequitably to underrepresented communities. Thus, there is an urgent need to establish robust governance to mitigate the issues and risks attendant when deploying AI.While numerous ethics, principles, and structures have been recommended, this article intends to address the policy lag by providing policymakers with a simple and compelling AI governance framework that situates AI principles as the guiding baseline for developing and evaluating policies. Rather than devising new policy recommendations, the most recent (at the time of writing) and comprehensive governance documents from China, the European Union, and the United States were systematically selected, and examined in a comparative analysis to study how the three regimes address AI principles. Based on the comparative analysis, the most comprehensive and effective recommendations were selected to produce seven broad policy recommendations. The governance framework and recommendations are intentionally broad so that they can be adapted to adequately address AI principles across diverse contexts, encouraging the implementation of AI principles, increasing the likelihood of beneficial AI, and reducing the risks and harms associated with the technology. Nevertheless, the recommendations provided should not be considered exhaustive as the technology has an immense reach and new AI governance initiatives are developing continuously in this growth period in AI governance. It is thus essential for policymakers to survey the most current and relevant governance landscape to identify the best practices that are suitable for their specific context and need.
引用
收藏
页码:793 / 810
页数:17
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Taeihagh A(2021)Governance of artificial intelligence Policy Soc. 40 137-157
[2]  
Cath C(2018)Governing artificial intelligence: ethical, legal and technical opportunities and challenges Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 376 20180080-399
[3]  
Fjeld J(2020)Principled artificial intelligence: mapping consensus in ethical and rights-based approaches to principles for AI SSRN Electron. J. 1 389-206
[4]  
Achten N(2019)The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines Nat. Mach. Intell. 31 201-343
[5]  
Hilligoss H(2019)A unified framework of five principles for AI in society Harv. Data Sci. Rev. 68 309-132
[6]  
Jobin A(2016)Racing to the precipice: a model of artificial intelligence development AI Soc. 2017 113-2631
[7]  
Ienca M(2019)International human rights law as a framework for algorithmic accountability Int. Comp. Law Q. 10 261-280
[8]  
Vayena E(2017)Cross-cultural privacy prediction Proc. Priv. Enhanc. Technol. 114 254-77
[9]  
Floridi L(2020)Bridging the gap between ethics and practice: guidelines for reliable, safe, and trustworthy human-centered AI systems ACM Trans. Interact Intell. Syst. 36 59-undefined
[10]  
Cowls J(2017)The future of employment: how susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technol. Forecast Soc. Change undefined undefined-undefined