Robotic CME in obese patients: advantage of robotic ultrasound scan for vascular dissection

被引:0
作者
Vicky Maertens
Samuel Stefan
Ioannis Mykoniatis
Najaf Siddiqi
Gerald David
Jim S. Khan
机构
[1] Portsmouth Hospitals University,Department of Colorectal Surgery
[2] NHS Trust,Faculty of Sciences, School of Health Sciences and Social Work
[3] University Hospital Dorset NHS Foundation Trust,undefined
[4] University of Portsmouth,undefined
[5] Queen Alexandra Hospital,undefined
来源
Journal of Robotic Surgery | 2023年 / 17卷
关键词
Robotic colorectal surgery; Complete mesocolic excision; Robotic ultrasound scan; Obese patients;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Complete mesocolic excision (CME) in right-sided colon cancers appears to confer oncological benefits compared to conventional colectomy. Identification of the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) remains challenging. We describe the novel use of intra-operative robotic ultrasound scan (rUSS) in obese patients (BMI ≥ 29). All consecutive patients having robotic CME for colon cancer between 2014 and 2017 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Data were recorded on an ethics approved prospective database and included patient demographics, clinical and oncological outcomes. Patients were divided into group 1 (BMI ≤ 28) and group 2 (BMI ≥ 29). SMV first approach was employed in all cases and SMV detection was aided using rUSS in group 2. Primary outcome was postoperative morbidity. Secondary outcomes included conversion rate, operative time and length of stay (LOS). 41 (group 1, median 66 years) were compared to 32 patients (group 2, median 63 years). There were no conversions to laparoscopy or laparotomy. Median operative times for group 2 were 30 min longer (186 vs. 216 min, p = 0.05). Overall morbidity was similar (20% vs. 19% in group 1 and 2, p = 0.26). There was no significant difference between the two groups with regard to LOS (median 7 vs. 6 days, p = 0.48), readmissions (2 vs. 5, p = 0.13), R0 resection rate (98% vs. 94%, p = 0.43) and lymph node harvest (median 31 vs. 30, p = 0.28).CME can be technically more challenging than conventional colectomy in obese patients and is associated with longer operative times. The use of rUSS in obese patients can help to identify SMV and allow safer dissection.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 161
页数:6
相关论文
共 135 条
[1]  
An MS(2018)Oncological outcomes of complete versus conventional mesocolic excision in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy ANZ J Surg 88 E698-e702
[2]  
Baik H(2009)Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation—technical notes and outcome Colorectal Dis 11 354-364
[3]  
Oh SH(2016)Complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation for colon cancer: principle, anatomy, surgical technique, and outcomes Surg Oncol 25 252-262
[4]  
Park YH(2018)Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy with complete mesocolic excision for the treatment of colon cancer: perioperative outcomes and 5-year survival in a consecutive series of 202 patients Ann Surg Oncol 25 3580-3586
[5]  
Seo SH(2017)Safety, quality and effect of complete mesocolic excision vs non-complete mesocolic excision in patients with colon cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis Colorectal Dis 19 962-972
[6]  
Kim KH(2019)Complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer: is it worth it? J Gastrointest Oncol 10 1215-1221
[7]  
Hohenberger W(2019)Challenges of robotic gynecologic surgery in morbidly obese patients and how to optimize success Curr Pain Headache Rep 23 51-3566
[8]  
Weber K(2019)The impact of robotic colorectal surgery in obese patients: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression Surg Endosc 33 3558-1053
[9]  
Matzel K(2020)Obese patients and robotic colorectal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis BJS Open 4 1042-506
[10]  
Papadopoulos T(2019)Ultrasound-guided identification of superior mesenteric vein in robotic complete mesocolic excision for right colon cancer Tech Coloproctol 23 505-217