Depth and habitat determine assemblage structure of South Africa’s warm-temperate reef fish

被引:0
作者
E. R. Heyns-Veale
A. T. F. Bernard
N. B. Richoux
D. Parker
T. J. Langlois
E. S. Harvey
A. Götz
机构
[1] Rhodes University,Department of Zoology and Entomology
[2] South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity (SAIAB),Department of Ichthyology and Fisheries Science
[3] South African Environmental Observation Network,The UWA Oceans Institute and School of Plant Biology, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences
[4] Elwandle Node,Department of Environment and Agriculture
[5] Rhodes University,Zoology Department
[6] The University of Western Australia,undefined
[7] Curtin University,undefined
[8] Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University,undefined
来源
Marine Biology | 2016年 / 163卷
关键词
Habitat Type; Fish Assemblage; Reef Fish; Marine Protected Area; Reef Site;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Depth and habitat are important predictors of fish assemblage structure, yet current no-take marine protected area (MPA) networks are generally limited to providing refuge for fish species that inhabit shallow waters and may exclude deep habitats essential to exploited populations. To ensure MPA efficacy at the design, uptake and management levels, baseline data on fish populations associated with deep nearshore reefs are needed. This study employed baited remote underwater stereo-video systems to investigate fish habitat associations at shallow (11–25 m) and deep (45–75 m) reef sites in the Tsitsikamma National Park MPA, South Africa. The compositions of fish assemblages at shallow and deep reef sites were significantly different. Specifically, rare species, juveniles and low trophic level species dominated the shallow reef, while deep reef assemblages were characterised by large, sexually mature and predatory fish. The body size of abundant species was also correlated with depth, with larger individuals being more abundant on deeper reefs. Habitat types were identified according to a habitat classification system established in a previous study, which resulted in four broad depth separated habitat types (defined by macrobenthos and environmental variables). Canonical analysis of principle coordinates (CAP) indicated that habitat type was a good categorical predictor of the observed fish assemblages. The CAP analysis determined that 86 % of the samples were correctly assigned to the habitat type from which they were collected, indicating that specific fish assemblages were associated with distinct habitat types. This study highlights the importance of protecting both shallow and deep reefs, not only to ensure the conservation of particular fish assemblages, but also to provide protection for all stages of the life cycle of fish species.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 261 条
  • [1] Allendorf FW(2009)Human-induced evolution caused by unnatural selection through harvest of wild animals Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106 9987-9994
  • [2] Hard JJ(2003)Canonical analysis of principal coordinates: a useful method of constrained ordination for ecology Ecology 84 511-525
  • [3] Anderson MJ(2005)Consistency and variation in kelp holdfast assemblages: spatial patterns of biodiversity for the major phyla at different taxonomic resolutions J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 320 35-56
  • [4] Willis TJ(2006)Multivariate dispersion as a measure of beta diversity Ecol Lett 9 683-693
  • [5] Anderson MJ(2009)Multi-scale fish–habitat associations and the use of habitat surrogates to predict the organisation and abundance of deep-water fish assemblages J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 379 34-42
  • [6] Diebel CE(2008)Marine reserves: the need for systems Hydrobiologia 606 35-44
  • [7] Blom WM(2004)Maternal age as a determinant of larval growth and survival in a marine fish Ecology 85 1258-1264
  • [8] Landers TJ(2012)Bait increases the precision in count data from remote underwater video for most subtidal reef fish in the warm-temperate Agulhas bioregion Mar Ecol Prog Ser 471 235-252
  • [9] Anderson MJ(2014)New possibilities for research on reef fish across the continental shelf of South Africa S Afr J Sci 110 1-5
  • [10] Ellingsen KE(2005)The importance in fishery management of leaving the big ones Trends Ecol Evol 20 356-358