The dynamics of relevance: adaptive belief revision

被引:0
作者
Frederik Van De Putte
Peter Verdée
机构
[1] Ghent University,Centre for Logic and Philosophy of Science
来源
Synthese | 2012年 / 187卷
关键词
Dynamic belief revision; Relevance; Splittings; Adaptive logics;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper presents eight (previously unpublished) adaptive logics for belief revision, each of which define a belief revision operation in the sense of the AGM framework. All these revision operations are shown to satisfy the six basic AGM postulates for belief revision, and Parikh’s axiom of Relevance. Using one of these logics as an example, we show how their proof theory gives a more dynamic flavor to belief revision than existing approaches. It is argued that this turns belief revision (that obeys Relevance) into a more natural undertaking, where analytic steps are performed only as soon as they turn out to be necessary in order to uphold certain beliefs.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 42
页数:41
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Alchourrón C. E.(1985)On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions Journal of Symbolic Logic 50 510-530
[2]  
Gärdenfors P.(2005)A procedural criterion for final derivability in inconsistency-adaptive logics Journal of Applied Logic 3 221-250
[3]  
Makinson D.(2007)A universal logic approach to adaptive logics Logica Universalis 1 221-242
[4]  
Batens D.(2009)Yes fellows, most human reasoning is complex Synthese 166 113-131
[5]  
Batens D.(2003)Some adaptive logics for diagnosis Logic and Logical Philosophy 11/12 39-65
[6]  
Batens D.(2009)On the transparency of defeasible logics: Equivalent premise sets, equivalence of their extensions, and maximality of the lower limit Logique et Analyse 207 281-304
[7]  
Clercq K.(2000)Relevance sensitive belief structures Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 28 259-285
[8]  
Verdée P.(1978)Conditionals and changes of belief Acta Philosophica Fennica 30 381-404
[9]  
Meheus J.(1982)Rules for rational changes of belief Philosophical Studies 34 88-101
[10]  
Batens D.(2007)Welch Philip the undecidability of propositional adaptive logic Synthese 158 41-60