Histological type and marker expression of the primary tumour compared with its local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ

被引:0
作者
N Bijker
J L Peterse
L Duchateau
E C Robanus-Maandag
C A J Bosch
C Duval
S Pilotti
M J van de Vijver
机构
[1] The Netherlands Cancer Institute,Department of Pathology
[2] EORTC Data Center,Division of Experimental Therapy
[3] The Netherlands Cancer Institute,Department of Pathology
[4] Centre Henri Becquerel,Department of Pathology
[5] Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori,undefined
来源
British Journal of Cancer | 2001年 / 84卷
关键词
ductal carcinoma in situ; breast-conserving therapy; local recurrence; histology; immunohistochemistry;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We have investigated primary ductal carcinomas in situ (DCIS) of the breast and their local recurrences after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) for histological characteristics and marker expression. Patients who were randomized in the EORTC trial 10853 (wide local excision versus excision plus radiotherapy) and who developed a local recurrence were identified. Histology was reviewed for 116 cases; oestrogen and progesterone receptor status, and HER2/neu and p53 overexpression were assessed for 71 cases. Comparing the primary DCIS and the invasive or non-invasive recurrence, concordant histology was found in 62%, and identical marker expression in 63%. Although 11% of the recurrences developed at a distance from the primary DCIS, nearly all these showed the same histological and immunohistochemical profile. 5 patients developed well-differentiated DCIS or grade I invasive carcinoma after poorly differentiated DCIS. Although these recurrences occurred in the same quadrant as the primary DCIS, they may be considered as second primary tumours. Only 4 patients developed poorly differentiated DCIS or grade III invasive carcinoma after well differentiated DCIS. We conclude that in most cases the primary DCIS and its local recurrence are related histologically or by marker expression, suggesting that local recurrence usually reflects outgrowth of residual DCIS; progression of well differentiated DCIS towards poorly differentiated DCIS or grade III invasive carcinoma is a non-frequent event. © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign
引用
收藏
页码:539 / 544
页数:5
相关论文
共 112 条
[1]  
Bobrow LG(1994)The classification of ductal carcinoma in situ and its association with biological markers Semin Diagn Pathol 11 199-207
[2]  
Happerfield LC(1991)Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up Histopathology 19 403-410
[3]  
Gregory WM(1996)Incidence of and treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast JAMA 275 913-918
[4]  
Springall RD(1996)Intraductal carcinoma associated with invasive carcinoma of the breast. A comparison of the two lesions with implications for intraductal carcinoma classification systems Am J Clin Pathol 106 312-318
[5]  
Millis RR(1997)The clinical behavior of breast carcinoma is probably determined at the preinvasive stage (ductal carcinoma in situ) Cancer 80 1740-1745
[6]  
Elston CW(1994)Ductal carcinoma in situ: a proposal for a new classification Semin Diagn Pathol 11 167-180
[7]  
Ellis IO(2000)Radiotherapy in breast-conserving treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: first results of the EORTC randomised phase III trial 10853. EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group and EORTC Radiotherapy Group Lancet 355 528-533
[8]  
Ernster VL(1994)Evaluation of infiltrating ductal carcinomas with a DCIS component: correlation of the histologic type of the in situ component with grade of the infiltrating component Semin Diagn Pathol 11 215-222
[9]  
Barclay J(1995)Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Histologic categorization and its relationship to ploidy and immunohistochemical expression of hormone receptors, p53, and c-erbB-2 protein Cancer 75 2123-2131
[10]  
Kerlikowske K(1998)Comparison of loss of heterozygosity in primary and recurrent ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast Mod Pathol 11 1151-1159