Public willingness to pay for eradicating a harmful marine organism: the case of Aurelia aurita in South Korea

被引:0
作者
Ju-Hee Kim
Se-Jun Jin
Seung-Hoon Yoo
机构
[1] Seoul National University of Science & Technology,Department of Future Energy Convergence, College of Creativity and Convergence Studies
[2] Ocean Science and Technology Policy Research Section,undefined
[3] Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology,undefined
来源
Environmental Science and Pollution Research | 2022年 / 29卷
关键词
Harmful marine organism; Eradication; Willingness to pay; Contingent valuation; Zero observations;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Aurelia aurita (AA), a legally registered harmful marine organism in South Korea, is damaging marine human leisure activities, local residents’ tourism income, fisheries, and cooling water intake at power plants. The government is therefore seeking to eradicate AA by removing AA-attached larvae (polyps). This article looks into the public willingness to pay (WTP) for the eradication, utilizing a contingent valuation. For the sake of eliciting the WTP response, the one-and-one-half-bounded (OB) model was adopted. For comparison, the single-bounded (SB) model, which uses only the response to the first question in the OB model, was also applied. A spike model with a considerable plausibility that could explicitly deal with zero WTP responses was employed. Consequently, the estimation results of the SB model were used for further policy analysis. The household average WTP was estimated as KRW 3,911 (USD 3.49) per year, securing statistical significance. The national value was KRW 80.46 billion (USD 71.71 million) per annum. This figure can be interpreted as public value of the AA eradication project and used as essential basic data to evaluate the economic feasibility of implementing the project. Some factors such as income and education level significantly positively affected the intention of paying a suggested bid.
引用
收藏
页码:88839 / 88851
页数:12
相关论文
共 178 条
  • [21] Georgiou S(1999)Measuring goodness of fit for the double-bounded logit model: comment Am J Agric Econ 81 231-234
  • [22] Bishop RC(1996)Starting point bias in dichotomous choice valuation with follow-up questioning J Environ Econ Manage 30 112-131
  • [23] Boyle KJ(2017)Contemporary guidance for stated preference studies J Assoc Environ Resour Econ 4 319-405
  • [24] Bosch-Belmar M(2021)Improving noise policies in South Korea: non-market valuation based on an impact pathway approach Environ Sci Pollut Res 28 23510-23520
  • [25] Milisenda G(2020)What do we know about public acceptance of designating marine protected area? The case of Jaran Bay in South Korea Environ Sci Pollut Res 27 31715-31725
  • [26] Basso L(2012)Estimating the economic damage caused by jellyfish to fisheries in Korea Fish Sci 78 1147-1152
  • [27] Doyle TK(1986)On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities Rev Econ Stat 68 715-719
  • [28] Leone A(1997)Spike models in contingent valuation Am J Agric Econ 79 1013-1023
  • [29] Piraino S(1996)A multilevel modelling approach to triple-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation Environ Resour Econ 7 197-211
  • [30] Burton AC(2011)The economic impact of the invasion of Acacia saligna in Israel Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 18 118-127