Public willingness to pay for eradicating a harmful marine organism: the case of Aurelia aurita in South Korea

被引:0
作者
Ju-Hee Kim
Se-Jun Jin
Seung-Hoon Yoo
机构
[1] Seoul National University of Science & Technology,Department of Future Energy Convergence, College of Creativity and Convergence Studies
[2] Ocean Science and Technology Policy Research Section,undefined
[3] Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology,undefined
来源
Environmental Science and Pollution Research | 2022年 / 29卷
关键词
Harmful marine organism; Eradication; Willingness to pay; Contingent valuation; Zero observations;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Aurelia aurita (AA), a legally registered harmful marine organism in South Korea, is damaging marine human leisure activities, local residents’ tourism income, fisheries, and cooling water intake at power plants. The government is therefore seeking to eradicate AA by removing AA-attached larvae (polyps). This article looks into the public willingness to pay (WTP) for the eradication, utilizing a contingent valuation. For the sake of eliciting the WTP response, the one-and-one-half-bounded (OB) model was adopted. For comparison, the single-bounded (SB) model, which uses only the response to the first question in the OB model, was also applied. A spike model with a considerable plausibility that could explicitly deal with zero WTP responses was employed. Consequently, the estimation results of the SB model were used for further policy analysis. The household average WTP was estimated as KRW 3,911 (USD 3.49) per year, securing statistical significance. The national value was KRW 80.46 billion (USD 71.71 million) per annum. This figure can be interpreted as public value of the AA eradication project and used as essential basic data to evaluate the economic feasibility of implementing the project. Some factors such as income and education level significantly positively affected the intention of paying a suggested bid.
引用
收藏
页码:88839 / 88851
页数:12
相关论文
共 178 条
  • [1] Ahn J(2020)Social benefits of improving water infrastructure in South Korea: upgrading sewage treatment plants Environ Sci Pollut Res 27 11202-11212
  • [2] Moon H(1997)Modeling response incentive effects in dichotomous choice contingent valuation data Land Econ 73 309-324
  • [3] Shin J(1993)Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation Fed Regist 58 4601-4614
  • [4] Ryu J(2001)Bound and path effects in double and triple bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation Resour Energy Econ 23 191-213
  • [5] Alberini A(2009)Procedural invariance testing of the one-and-one-half-bound dichotomous choice elicitation method Rev Econ Stat 91 806-820
  • [6] Kanninen B(2019)Reliability and validity in nonmarket valuation Environ Resour Econ 72 559-582
  • [7] Carson RT(2020)Jellyfish impacts on marine aquaculture and fisheries Rev Fish Sci Aquac 29 242-259
  • [8] Arrow K(2003)An experimental investigation of explanations for inconsistencies in responses to second offers in double referenda J Environ Econ Manage 46 472-489
  • [9] Solow R(1994)Estimation using contingent valuation data from a dichotomous choice with follow-up questionnaire J Environ Econ Manage 27 218-234
  • [10] Portney PR(2007)Incentive and informational properties of preference questions Environ Resour Econ 37 181-210