Tacrolimus-eluting stent with biodegradable polymer is more effective than sirolimus- and everolimus-eluting stent in rabbit iliac artery restenosis model

被引:0
|
作者
Dae Sung Park
Jun-Kyu Park
Myung Ho Jeong
In-Ho Bae
So-Youn Lee
Eun Jae Jang
Kyung-Seob Lim
Jong Min Kim
Jung Ha Kim
Dae Young Hyun
Yun Ah Jeong
Hyun Kuk Kim
Doo Sun Sim
机构
[1] Korea Cardiovascular Stent Institute,
[2] The Cardiovascular Convergence Research Center of Chonnam National University Hospital Designated by Ministry of Health and Welfare,undefined
[3] CGBio Co. Ltd.,undefined
来源
Macromolecular Research | 2015年 / 23卷
关键词
tacrolimus; sirolimus; everolimus; stent; restenosis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Drug-eluting stents, which are widely used in percutaneous coronary intervention, are fabricated with various considerations, such as drugs, design, polymers, and coating techniques. The aim of this study was to compare tacrolimus-eluting stents (TES), sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and everolimus-eluting stents (EES) under identical conditions. Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) biodegradable polymer was used to coat bare metal stents (Chonnam National University Hospital Stent, CNUH Stent) with the drugs in all fabricating procedures with an ultrasonic stent-coating machine. Surface morphologies of the stents were investigated by scanning electron microscopy. The effect of drugs released from stents on rat smooth muscle and human umbilical vein endothelial cells was examined by MTT assay. The stents were implanted in rabbit iliac arteries randomly, with either TES (n=10), SES (n=10), or EES (n=10). After six weeks of implantation, the stents were isolated and subjected to histopathological analysis. Cell viability decreased in a dose-dependent manner. The surface morphologies of the stents showed a smooth and uniform shape. The release patterns of the stents showed similar profiles over 30 days. There were no significant differences in the injury score, internal elastic lamina, lumenal area, neointimal area, percent area stenosis, and inflammation score among the three groups. However, there was a significant difference in the fibrin score (0.6±0.44 in the TES, vs. 0.8±0.48 in the SES, vs. 0.8±0.61 in the EES, n=10, p<0.05). This study showed that tacrolimus was not inferior to sirolimus (SRL) and everolimus (EVL). Moreover, tacrolimus (TCL) is more effective in decreasing the fibrin score. Therefore, tacrolimus can be a useful alternative drug for fabricating drug-eluting stents.
引用
收藏
页码:1034 / 1041
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Tacrolimus-eluting stent with biodegradable polymer is more effective than sirolimus- and everolimus-eluting stent in rabbit iliac artery restenosis model
    Park, Dae Sung
    Park, Jun-Kyu
    Jeong, Myung Ho
    Bae, In-Ho
    Lee, So-Youn
    Jang, Eun Jae
    Lim, Kyung-Seob
    Kim, Jong Min
    Kim, Jung Ha
    Hyun, Dae Young
    Jeong, Yun Ah
    Kim, Hyun Kuk
    Sim, Doo Sun
    MACROMOLECULAR RESEARCH, 2015, 23 (11) : 1034 - 1041
  • [2] Ultrathin, Biodegradable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent vs Thin, Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent
    Nakamura, Masato
    Kadota, Kazushige
    Nakagawa, Yoshihisa
    Tanabe, Kengo
    Ito, Yoshiaki
    Amano, Tetsuya
    Maekawa, Yuichiro
    Takahashi, Akihiko
    Shiode, Nobuo
    Otsuka, Yoritaka
    Kawasaki, Tomohiro
    Hikichi, Yutaka
    Shite, Junya
    Kozuma, Ken
    Iijima, Raisuke
    Murakami, Yoshitaka
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2022, 15 (13) : 1324 - 1334
  • [3] Integrity of stent polymer layer after drug-eluting stent implantation: In vivo comparison of sirolimus-, paclitaxel-, zotarolimus- and everolimus-eluting stents
    Watanabe T.
    Fujita M.
    Awata M.
    Iida O.
    Okamoto S.
    Ishihara T.
    Uematsu M.
    Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics, 2014, 29 (1) : 4 - 10
  • [4] Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Tacrolimus-Eluting Stent in a Porcine Coronary Artery Model
    Park, Dae Sung
    Na, Mi Hyang
    Jeong, Myung Ho
    Sim, Doo Sun
    Jin, Yu Jeong
    Kee, Hae Jin
    Kim, Mun Ki
    Kim, Jeong Ha
    Hong, Young Joon
    Cho, Kyung Hoon
    Hyun, Dae Young
    Oh, Seok
    Lim, Kyung Seob
    Byeon, Dae-Heung
    Kim, Jeong Hun
    TISSUE ENGINEERING AND REGENERATIVE MEDICINE, 2024, 21 (05) : 723 - 735
  • [5] Everolimus-Eluting Biodegradable Polymer Versus Everolimus-Eluting Durable Polymer Stent for Coronary Revascularization in Routine Clinical Practice
    Zanchin, Christian
    Ueki, Yasushi
    Zanchin, Thomas
    Haner, Jonas
    Otsuka, Tatsuhiko
    Stortecky, Stefan
    Koskinas, Konstantinos C.
    Siontis, George C. M.
    Praz, Fabien
    Moschovitis, Aris
    Hunziker, Lukas
    Valgimigli, Marco
    Pilgrim, Thomas
    Heg, Dik
    Windecker, Stephan
    Raber, Lorenz
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2019, 12 (17) : 1665 - 1675
  • [6] Comparison of a Novel Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent With a Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent 5-Year Outcomes of the Randomized BIOFLOW-II Trial
    Lefevre, Thierry
    Haude, Michael
    Neumann, Franz-Josef
    Stangl, Karl
    Skurk, Carsten
    Slagboom, Ton
    Sabate, Manel
    Goicolea, Javier
    Barragan, Paul
    Cook, Stephane
    Macia, Jean-Christophe
    Windecker, Stephan
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2018, 11 (10) : 995 - 1002
  • [7] Bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting coronary stent compared with permanent polymer everolimus-eluting coronary stent implantation for treatment of small vessel coronary artery disease: CENTURY II trial
    Woehrle, Jochen
    Markovic, Sinisa
    Rottbauer, Wolfgang
    Muramatsu, Toshiya
    Kadota, Kazushige
    Vazquez-Gonzalez, Nicolas
    Odenstedt, Jacob
    Serra, Antonio
    Antoniucci, David
    Varenne, Olivier
    Saito, Shigeru
    Wijns, William
    EUROINTERVENTION, 2016, 12 (02) : E167 - E174
  • [8] Clinical outcomes of ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease
    Patted, Suresh, V
    Thakkar, Ashok S.
    ARYA ATHEROSCLEROSIS, 2020, 16 (03) : 130 - 135
  • [9] Outcomes of patients treated with a biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable-polymer everolimus-eluting stents after rotational atherectomy
    Mankerious, Nader
    Hemetsberger, Rayyan
    Traboulsi, Hussein
    Toelg, Ralph
    Abdel-Wahab, Mohamed
    Richardt, Gert
    Allali, Abdelhakim
    CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 110 (10) : 1574 - 1585
  • [10] Biolimus-eluting versus everolimus-eluting stents in coronary artery disease: a pooled analysis from the NEXT (NOBORI biolimus-eluting versus XIENCE/PROMUS everolimus-eluting stent) and COMPARE II (Abluminal biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimuseluting stent) randomised trials
    Vlachojannisi, Georgios J.
    Puricel, Serban
    Natsuaki, Masahiro
    Morimoto, Takeshi
    Smits, Picier C.
    Kimura, Takeshi
    EUROINTERVENTION, 2017, 12 (16) : 1970 - 1977