Comparing two-dimensional ultrasonography with three-dimensional ultrasonography and MRI for the levator ani defects grading

被引:0
作者
Yijia Luo
Honghong Pan
Linxin Yang
Ning Lin
Zhihua Fan
Weiji Chen
机构
[1] Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University,Department of Ultrasound
[2] Fujian Provincial Hospital,Department of Urology
[3] Fujian Provincial Hospital,undefined
来源
Scientific Reports | / 12卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Levator ani defect (LAD) closely correlates with pelvic floor disorders (PFD). In general, LAD was graded by three-dimensional ultrasonography (3D-US) and MRI, which could be used hardly in some developing area. Our objective was to determine whether two-dimensional ultrasonography (2D-US), a method that is almost universally accessible, could be used to diagnose the LAD. 129 Chinese women with PFD were recruited for the LAD grading by 2D-US and 3D-US and MRI. LAD was classified into intact, partial and complete avulsions. The puborectalis attachment width (PAW) was measured by 2D-US and with the software on the three-dimensional MRI-based LAD models. The results were compared and analyzed using the weighted kappa and the Pearson’s coefficient. Of the 119 patients, 64 were diagnosed with LAD by 2D-US, 70 were identified by 3D-US while 68 were confirmed by MRI. The LAD grading of 2D-US showed good agreement with MRI (kappa = 0.78, 95% CI 0.71–0.86) and 3D-US (kappa = 0.77, 95% CI 0.70–0.84). In regard to the consensus of partial or complete avulsions, 2D-US showed excellent good agreement with MRI (kappa = 0.86, 95% CI 0.73–0.97), superior than 3D-US with MRI (kappa = 0.55, 95% CI 0.36–0.71). Additionally, iliococcygeus avulsions detected by MRI (n = 7) were accompanied by complete puborectalis avulsions. The averaged PAW was 10.42 ± 5.57 mm measured by 2D-US, which correlated well with the results measured by MRI (Pearson’s coefficient = 0.90). 2D-US, 3D-US and MRI showed the good agreement on LAD diagnosis. Compared with MRI and 3D-US, 2D-US was comparable in grading LAD, especially complete avulsions.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 122 条
[1]  
Schwertner-Tiepelmann N(2012)Obstetric levator ani muscle injuries: current status Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 39 372-383
[2]  
Thakar R(2004)Levator ani muscle anatomy evaluated by origin-insertion pairs Obstet. Gynecol. 104 168-173
[3]  
Sultan AH(2006)Obstetric factors associated with levator ani muscle injury after vaginal birth Obstet. Gynecol. 107 144-149
[4]  
Tunn R(2003)The appearance of levator ani muscle abnormalities in magnetic resonance images after vaginal delivery Obstet. Gynecol. 101 46-53
[5]  
Kearney R(2005)Levator trauma after vaginal delivery Obstet. Gynecol. 106 707-712
[6]  
Sawhney R(2007)Quantification of major morphological abnormalities of the levator ani Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 29 329-334
[7]  
DeLancey JO(1996)Magnetic resonance imaging of the levator ani with anatomic correlation Obstet. Gynecol. 87 277-285
[8]  
Kearney R(2016)MRI changes of pelvic floor and pubic bone observed in primiparous women after childbirth by normal vaginal delivery Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 294 285-289
[9]  
Miller JM(2011)Minimal criteria for the diagnosis of avulsion of the puborectalis muscle by tomographic ultrasound Int. Urogynecol. J. 22 699-704
[10]  
Ashton-Miller JA(2009)Levator defects can be detected by 2D translabial ultrasound Int. Urogynecol J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 20 807-811