Affective state and decision-making in the Ultimatum Game

被引:0
作者
Mascha van ’t Wout
René S. Kahn
Alan G. Sanfey
André Aleman
机构
[1] Utrecht University,Department of Psychonomics, Helmholtz Institute
[2] University Medical Center Utrecht,Department of Psychiatry, Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience
[3] University of Arizona,Department of Psychology
[4] University of Groningen,BCN NeuroImaging Center
来源
Experimental Brain Research | 2006年 / 169卷
关键词
Decision-making; Emotion; Arousal; Skin conductance; Ultimatum Game; Social utility;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The emerging field of neuroeconomics has provided evidence that emotional as well as cognitive processes may contribute to economic decision-making. Indeed, activation of the anterior insula, a brain area involved in emotional processing, has been shown to predict decision-making in the Ultimatum Game. However, as the insula has also been implicated in other brain functions, converging evidence on the role of emotion in the Ultimatum Game is needed. In the present study, 30 healthy undergraduate students played the Ultimatum Game while their skin conductance responses were measured as an autonomic index of affective state. The results revealed that skin conductance activity was higher for unfair offers and was associated with the rejection of unfair offers in the Ultimatum Game. Interestingly, this pattern was only observed for offers proposed by human conspecifics, but not for offers generated by computers. This provides direct support for economic models that acknowledge the role of emotional brain systems in everyday decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:564 / 568
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Bechara A(2005)The somatic marker hypothesis: a neural theory of economic decision Games Econ Behav 52 336-372
[2]  
Damasio AR(1997)Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy Science 275 1293-1295
[3]  
Bechara A(1999)Different contributions of the human amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex to decision-making J Neurosci 19 5473-5481
[4]  
Damasio H(2005)The Iowa Gambling Task and the somatic marker hypothesis: some questions and answers Trends Cogn Sci 9 159-162
[5]  
Tranel D(1995)Anonymity versus punishment in Ultimatum Bargaining Games Econ Behav 10 95-121
[6]  
Damasio AR(2003)Strategizing in the brain Science 300 1673-1675
[7]  
Bechara A(2004)Neural systems supporting interoceptive awareness Nat Neurosci 7 189-195
[8]  
Damasio H(1982)An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining J Econ Behav Organ 3 367-388
[9]  
Damasio AR(2001)The relevance of equal splits in ultimatum games Games Econ Behav 37 161-169
[10]  
Lee GP(2000)Fairness versus reason in the Ultimatum Game Science 289 1773-1775