Experimental Evaluation of Effect Factors on Seismic Performance of Concrete Columns Reinforced with HTRB630 High-Strength Steel Bars

被引:0
作者
Chuanzhi Sun
Mei-Ling Zhuang
Bo Dong
机构
[1] Suqian College,School of Civil Engineering and Architecture
[2] Nantong University,School of Transportation and Civil Engineering
[3] The University of Adelaide,School of Civil, Environmental & Mining Engineering
[4] D&R Institute Ltd,Jiangsu Province Architectural
来源
International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials | 2022年 / 16卷
关键词
HTRB630 high-strength steel bars; seismic performance; failure modes; hysteretic loops; skeleton curves; bear capacity and ductility; energy dissipation capacity; stiffness degradation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
HTRB630 steel bar is a new type of high-strength steel bars. To study the seismic performance and promote the application of concrete columns reinforced with HTRB630 high-strength steel bars, the pseudo-static test of 10 concrete columns reinforced with HTRB630 high-strength steel bars and 3 concrete columns reinforced with HRB400 was carried out. Test specimens were divided into five categories according to concrete grade, reinforcement strength, and degree of confinement. The effect of concrete strength (C45 and C60), axial load ratio (0.1 and 0.25), equal strength substitution of longitudinal reinforcements (HTRB630 and HRB400), equal strength and volume substitution of stirrups (HTRB630 and HRB400), equal strength substitution of confined reinforcements (HTRB630 and HRB400) on the seismic performance are analyzed and discussed from the failure mode, hysteresis loops, skeleton curves, lateral strength, ductility, energy dissipation capacity, stiffness and strength degradation. The failure mode of each specimen was bending failure. Reducing of the axial lo ratio or increasing the strength of reinforcements, the seismic performance of the specimen could be improved. C60 concrete can improve the seismic performance of HTRB630 reinforced columns. The lateral strength of the concrete column specimen with HTRB630 reinforcements was slightly increased, and the ductility and energy dissipation capacity were reduced, the stiffness degradation was more gradual, the strength degradation coefficient was greater than 0.94, but still met the requirements of the code for seismic design of buildings (GB50011-2010).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Bayrak O(1997)High-strength concrete columns under simulated earthquake loading ACI Structural Journal 94 708-722
[2]  
Sheikh SA(2002)Seismic design of columns with high-strength wire and strand as spiral reinforcement ACI Structural Journal 99 660-670
[3]  
Budek AM(2019)Experimental study on high strength concrete encased steel composite short columns Construction and Building Materials 228 206-219
[4]  
Pristley M(2019)Size effect on seismic performance of high-strength reinforced concrete columns subjected to monotonic and cyclic loading Engineering Structures 183 64-74
[5]  
Lee CO(2014)Experimental study on seismic behavior of high-strength reinforced concrete frame China Civil Engineering 11 47-60
[6]  
Lai BL(1990)Ductility improvement of high-strength concrete columns with lateral confinement Special Publication 121 123-134
[7]  
Richard LJY(2009)Use of high-strength bars for the seismic performance of high-strength concrete columns Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology 7 155-166
[8]  
Xiong MX(1989)Valuation of ductility of structures and structural assemblages from laboratory testing Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering 22 135-142
[9]  
Li ZB(2012)Reconsidering the use of high-strength reinforcement in concrete columns Steel Construction 37 20-27
[10]  
Yu CY(2014)Comparative experimental research on seismic performance of rectangular concrete columns reinforced with high strength steel Journal of Building Structures 35 61-88