Uncovering continuous and transient monitoring profiles in event-based prospective memory

被引:0
|
作者
B. Hunter Ball
Gene A. Brewer
Shayne Loft
Vanessa Bowden
机构
[1] Arizona State University,Department of Psychology
[2] The University of Western Australia,undefined
来源
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review | 2015年 / 22卷
关键词
Prospective memory; Memory and attention; Ex-gaussian function; Response costs;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The present study implemented response time distribution modeling to better characterize context-specific attention dynamics underlying task interference due to possessing a prospective memory intention. During a three-phase paradigm in which prospective memory cues appeared only in the final phase, prospective memory performance was better when participants were informed at encoding of the context in which cues were to appear than when participants were not informed. Additionally, task interference increased during the third phase when the cue context was previously specified. Ex-Gaussian parameter estimates revealed that task interference during the third phase was due to a greater relative frequency of longer latencies, rather than an overall increase in latencies across all trials, suggesting that participants relied primarily on transient, rather than continuous, monitoring processes to support cue detection. Functionally, variability in transient and continuous monitoring profiles was predictive of prospective memory cue detection. More generally, the results from the present study suggest that ex-Gaussian parameter estimation procedures may provide a fruitful avenue for better understanding how attention is differentially allocated to ongoing tasks, what processes might underlie monitoring behavior, and how this behavior is related to eventual intention fulfillment.
引用
收藏
页码:492 / 499
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Social importance enhances prospective memory: evidence from an event-based task
    Walter, Stefan
    Meier, Beat
    MEMORY, 2017, 25 (06) : 777 - 783
  • [42] Early developmental trends on time-and event-based prospective memory tasks
    Shum, David
    Matjac, Rochelle
    Ward, Heather
    EDUCATIONAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 2005, 22 (01) : 38 - 53
  • [43] Task interference in time-based, event-based, and dual intention prospective memory conditions
    Hicks, JL
    Marsh, RL
    Cook, GI
    JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2005, 53 (03) : 430 - 444
  • [44] NEURAL CORRELATES OF PROSPECTIVE MEMORY: A COMPARISON BETWEEN A TIME-BASED AND AN EVENT-BASED TASK
    Arcara, Giorgio
    Cona, Giorgia
    Tarantino, Vincenza
    Bisiacchi, Patrizia Silvia
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 48 : S75 - S76
  • [45] Event-Based but Not Time-Based Prospective Memory Is Related to Oral Health in Late Adulthood
    Manchery, Nithin
    Nangle, Matthew R.
    Grainger, Sarah A.
    Haines, Simon
    Pradhan, Archana
    Rendell, Peter G.
    Henry, Julie D.
    GERONTOLOGY, 2021, 67 (01) : 112 - 120
  • [46] Processing of negative stimuli facilitates event-based prospective memory only under low memory load
    Pedale, Tiziana
    Basso, Demis
    Santangelo, Valerio
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 29 (08) : 920 - 928
  • [47] Evidence of Impaired Event-Based Prospective Memory in Clinical Obsessive-Compulsive Checking
    Harris, Lynne M.
    Vaccaro, Lisa
    Jones, Mairwen K.
    Boots, Georgina M.
    BEHAVIOUR CHANGE, 2010, 27 (02) : 84 - 92
  • [48] Do Inhibitory Control Demands Affect Event-Based Prospective Memory Performance in ADHD?
    Altgassen, Mareike
    Koch, Andrea
    Kliegel, Matthias
    JOURNAL OF ATTENTION DISORDERS, 2019, 23 (01) : 51 - 56
  • [49] Event-based prospective memory and obsessive-compulsive disorder intrusive obsessional thoughts
    Harris, Lynne
    Cranney, Jacquelyn
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 64 (04) : 235 - 242
  • [50] The role of visual perceptual style and personality disorder traits in event-based prospective memory
    Nigro, Giovanna
    Cicogna, Piera Carla
    D'Olimpio, Francesca
    Cosenza, Marina
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2012, 53 (07) : 912 - 916