Gated blood pool SPECT for measurement of left ventricular volumes and left ventricular ejection fraction: comparison of 8 and 16 frame gated blood pool SPECT

被引:0
|
作者
Seong-Jang Kim
In-Ju Kim
Yun-Seong Kim
Yong-Ki Kim
机构
[1] Pusan National University Hospital,Department of Nuclear Medicine
[2] Pusan National University Hospital,Department of Internal Medicine
来源
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | 2005年 / 21卷
关键词
end-diastolic volume; end-systolic volume; gated blood pool SPECT; 8 and 16 frame; left ventricular ejection fraction;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Gated blood pool SPECT (GBPS) is an alternative to planar radionuclide ventriculography (PRNV) and offers potential advantages. The aim of this study was to compare 8 and 16 frame GBPS for the determination of left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF) and left ventricular volumes (LV) in subjects underwent two consecutive GBPS. Method: About 66 consecutive patients (30 men, 36 women; mean age 62.3 ± 10.4 years) referred for PRNV for evaluation of preoperative cardiac risk stratification (n=40), prechemotherapy cardiac function evaluation (n=18, breast cancer), and congestive heart failure patients (n=8). All patients underwent PRNV of 16 frame and GBPS with both of 8 and 16 frame. Results: The mean LVEF calculated with PRNV (58.3 ± 16.8), showed statistically lower than 8-GBPS (70.6 ± 17.7), and 16-GBPS (69.9 ± 16.8) (PRNV vs. 8-GBPS, p < 0.01; PRNV vs 16-GBPS, p < 0.01; 8-GBPS vs 16-GBPS, p > 0.05). The correlation of LVEFS between 8-GBPS and 16-GBPS showed a correlation coefficient of 0.9194 (p < 0.01, 95% CI=0.8712–0.9500). The mean left ventricular end-diastolic volumes (EDV) calculated with 8-GBPS (83.2 ± 33.5 ml), and 16-GBPS (88.4 ± 36.8 ml) showed no statistical differences (p > 0.05). The mean left ventricular end-systolic volumes (ESV) calculated with 8-GBPS (28.1 ± 31.4 ml), and 16-GBPS (30.5 ± 33 ml) showed also no statistical differences (p > 0.05). Comparison of EDV from 8 and 16-GBPS yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.7430 (p < 0.01, 95% CI=0.6108-0.8349). The correlation between ESV of 8-GBPS and 16-GBPS showed a correlation coefficient of 0.9522 (p < 0.01, 95% CI=0.9228–0.9705). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the LVEFs of 8-GBPS correlated well with that of 16-GBPS. The LVEF of PRNV was significantly lower than those of 8 and 16-GBPS. Also, left ventricular EDV and ESV of 8-GBPS correlated well with those of 16-GBPS. Also, further studies, involving large lumber patients, should be performed to validate the usefulness of GBPS for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 266
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Gated blood pool SPECT for measurement of left ventricular volumes and left ventricular ejection fraction: comparison of 8 and 16 frame gated blood pool SPECT
    Kim, SJ
    Kim, IJ
    Kim, YS
    Kim, YK
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2005, 21 (2-3) : 261 - 266
  • [2] Automatic quantification of right ventricular volumes and right ventricular ejection fraction with gated blood pool SPECT: Comparison of 8- and 16-frame gated blood pool SPECT with first-pass radionuclide angiography
    Kim, SJ
    Kim, IJ
    Kim, YS
    Kim, YK
    Shin, YB
    Kim, DS
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 12 (05) : 553 - 559
  • [3] Automatic quantification of right ventricular volumes and right ventricular ejection fraction with gated blood pool SPECT: Comparison of 8- and 16-frame gated blood pool SPECT with first-pass radionuclide angiography
    Seong-Jang Kim
    In-Ju Kim
    Yun-Seong Kim
    Yong-Ki Kim
    Yong Beom Shin
    Dong-Soo Kim
    Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2005, 12 : 553 - 559
  • [4] Gated blood-pool SPECT versus cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction
    Harel, Francois
    Finnerty, Vincent
    Gregoire, Jean
    Thibault, Bernard
    Marcotte, Francois
    Ugolini, Patricia
    Khairy, Paul
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 17 (03) : 427 - 434
  • [5] SPECT versus planar gated blood pool imaging for left ventricular evaluation
    Harel, Francois
    Finnerty, Vincent
    Ngo, Quam
    Gregoire, Jean
    Khairy, Paul
    Thibault, Bernard
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 14 (04) : 544 - 549
  • [6] Is 16-frame really superior to 8-frame gated SPECT for the assessment of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction? Comparison of two simultaneously acquired gated SPECT studies
    Giulia Montelatici
    Roberto Sciagrà
    Alessandro Passeri
    Manjola Dona
    Alberto Pupi
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2008, 35 : 2059 - 2065
  • [7] SPECT versus planar gated blood pool imaging for left ventricular evaluation
    François Harel
    Vincent Finnerty
    Quam Ngo
    Jean Grégoire
    Paul Khairy
    Bernard Thibault
    Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2007, 14 : 544 - 549
  • [8] Is 16-frame really superior to 8-frame gated SPECT for the assessment of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction? Comparison of two simultaneously acquired gated SPECT studies
    Montelatici, Giulia
    Sciagra, Roberto
    Passeri, Alessandro
    Dona, Manjola
    Pupi, Alberto
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2008, 35 (11) : 2059 - 2065
  • [9] Evaluation of Left and Right Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Volumes from Gated Blood-Pool SPECT in Patients with Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Comparison with Cardiac MRI
    Xie, Bo-Qia
    Tian, Yue-Qin
    Zhang, Jian
    Zhao, Shi-Hua
    Yang, Min-Fu
    Guo, Feng
    Wang, Dao-Yu
    Wei, Hong-Xing
    Chu, Ke-Wei
    He, Zuo-Xiang
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2012, 53 (04) : 584 - 591
  • [10] Gated myocardial perfusion tomography versus gated blood pool tomography for the calculation of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction
    Vanhove, C
    Walgraeve, N
    De Geeter, F
    Franken, PR
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2002, 29 (06) : 735 - 741