Management of prosthetic joint infections: a guidelines comparison

被引：6
作者：
Ometti M. [1 ]
Delmastro E. [2 ]
Salini V. [2 ]
机构：
[1] Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan
[2] Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan
来源：
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY | 2022年 / 106卷 / 3期
关键词：
Arthroplasty; Guidelines; PJI; Prosthetic joint infections;
D O I：
10.1007/s12306-021-00734-7
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Background: In the last decade, the number of prosthetic joint replacements has been rising each year and this growing trend is related to the increased number of prosthetic joint infections (PJI). As PJI represent a devastating condition for the patient, physicians must identify the best treatment option for each case. Guidelines are not always clear regarding the most appropriate therapy pathway as they differ in many parameters. Materials and methods: Aim of this article is to compare the different indications as reported by four major Academic Societies: the Infectious Disease Society of America, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, and the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) which published the guideline in partnership with the European Bone And Joint Infection Society. Conclusions: PJI Guidelines differ in many parameters, therefore the choice of treatment for each case does not appear immediate; it would be desirable that, in the next few years, new scientific evidence will help clarify the indications of the most effective therapeutic protocols for PJI to determine the ultimate surgical strategy for every single patient. © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli.
引用
收藏
页码：219 / 226
页数：7
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [11] Osmon D.R., Berbari E.F., Berendt A.R., Et al., Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: clinical practice guidelines by the infectious diseases society of America, Clin Infect Dis, 56, 1, pp. e1-e25, (2013)
  • [12] Parvizi J., Adeli B., Zmistowski B., Et al., Management of periprosthetic joint infection: the current knowledge: AAOS exhibit selection, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 94, 14, (2012)
  • [13] Parvizi J., Gehrke T., Chen A.F., Proceedings of the international consensus on periprosthetic joint infection, Bone Joint J, 95-B, 11, pp. 1450-1452, (2013)
  • [14] Zahar A., Gehrke T.A., One-Stage revision for infected total hip arthroplasty, Orthop Clin N orth Am, 47, 1, pp. 11-18, (2016)
  • [15] Zahar A., Kendoff D.O., Klatte T.O., Et al., Can good infection control be obtained in one-stage exchange of the infected TKA to a rotating hinge design? 10-year results, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 474, 1, pp. 81-87, (2016)
  • [16] Meani A., Pellegrini A., Trezza P., Algoritmo Di Trattamento Delle Infezioni Delle Protesi Articolari. Trattato Di Tecniche Chirurgiche Chirurgia Ortopedica., (2010)
  • [17] Cierny G., Mader J.T., Penninck J.J., A clinical staging system for adult osteomyelitis, Contemp Orthop, 10, pp. 17-37, (1985)
  • [18] Pipino F., Molfetta L., GIR classification of acetabular and femoral bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty surgery, J OrthopTraumatol, 1, 2, pp. 69-77, (2000)
  • [19] Xu C., Goswami K., Li W.T., Tan T.L., Yayac M., Wang S.H., Parvizi J., Is treatment of periprosthetic joint infection improving over time?, J Arthroplasty, 35, 6, pp. 1696-1702.e1, (2020)
12