Improving Ecological Response Monitoring of Environmental Flows

被引:0
作者
Alison J. King
Ben Gawne
Leah Beesley
John D. Koehn
Daryl L. Nielsen
Amina Price
机构
[1] Charles Darwin University,Research Institute for Environment and Livelihoods
[2] Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research,Centre of Excellence in Natural Resource Management
[3] The Murray-Darling Freshwater Research Centre,undefined
[4] La Trobe University,undefined
[5] University of Western Australia,undefined
来源
Environmental Management | 2015年 / 55卷
关键词
Environmental water; River restoration; Conceptual models; Adaptive management;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Environmental flows are now an important restoration technique in flow-degraded rivers, and with the increasing public scrutiny of their effectiveness and value, the importance of undertaking scientifically robust monitoring is now even more critical. Many existing environmental flow monitoring programs have poorly defined objectives, nonjustified indicator choices, weak experimental designs, poor statistical strength, and often focus on outcomes from a single event. These negative attributes make them difficult to learn from. We provide practical recommendations that aim to improve the performance, scientific robustness, and defensibility of environmental flow monitoring programs. We draw on the literature and knowledge gained from working with stakeholders and managers to design, implement, and monitor a range of environmental flow types. We recommend that (1) environmental flow monitoring programs should be implemented within an adaptive management framework; (2) objectives of environmental flow programs should be well defined, attainable, and based on an agreed conceptual understanding of the system; (3) program and intervention targets should be attainable, measurable, and inform program objectives; (4) intervention monitoring programs should improve our understanding of flow-ecological responses and related conceptual models; (5) indicator selection should be based on conceptual models, objectives, and prioritization approaches; (6) appropriate monitoring designs and statistical tools should be used to measure and determine ecological response; (7) responses should be measured within timeframes that are relevant to the indicator(s); (8) watering events should be treated as replicates of a larger experiment; (9) environmental flow outcomes should be reported using a standard suite of metadata. Incorporating these attributes into future monitoring programs should ensure their outcomes are transferable and measured with high scientific credibility.
引用
收藏
页码:991 / 1005
页数:14
相关论文
共 403 条
[21]  
Wilson GG(2006)Abundance trends and status of the Little Colorado River population of humpback chub North Am J Fish Manag 26 233-245
[22]  
Bunn SE(2010)The sustainable rivers audit: assessing river ecosystem health in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia Marine Freshw Res 61 764-777
[23]  
Balcombe SR(2014)Flow–ecology relationships: closing the loop on effective environmental flows Mar Freshw Res 65 133-141
[24]  
Lobegeiger JS(2012)A bayesian belief network decision support tool for watering wetlands to maximise native fish outcomes Wetlands 32 277-287
[25]  
Marshall SM(2014)Habitat selection and movement of adult Humpback Chub in the Colorado River in Grand Canyon, Arizona, during an experimental steady flow release N Am J Fish Manage 34 39-48
[26]  
Marshall JC(2007)Power and sample size estimation techniques for fisheries management: assessment and a new computational tool North Am J Fish Manag 27 397-404
[27]  
Ly D(2014)A critical analysis of regulated river ecosystem responses to managed environmental flows from reservoirs Freshwater Biol 60 410-425
[28]  
Jones DN(1997)Catch-effort maximum likelihood estimation of important population parameters Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54 880-897
[29]  
Barrett R(2004)Monitoring environmental flow regimes: potential problems with management decision errors and their consequences Ecol Manage Restor 5 216-217
[30]  
Nielsen D(2012)Why is achieving good ecological outcomes in rivers so difficult? Freshwater Biol 57 91-107