Improving Ecological Response Monitoring of Environmental Flows

被引:0
作者
Alison J. King
Ben Gawne
Leah Beesley
John D. Koehn
Daryl L. Nielsen
Amina Price
机构
[1] Charles Darwin University,Research Institute for Environment and Livelihoods
[2] Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research,Centre of Excellence in Natural Resource Management
[3] The Murray-Darling Freshwater Research Centre,undefined
[4] La Trobe University,undefined
[5] University of Western Australia,undefined
来源
Environmental Management | 2015年 / 55卷
关键词
Environmental water; River restoration; Conceptual models; Adaptive management;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Environmental flows are now an important restoration technique in flow-degraded rivers, and with the increasing public scrutiny of their effectiveness and value, the importance of undertaking scientifically robust monitoring is now even more critical. Many existing environmental flow monitoring programs have poorly defined objectives, nonjustified indicator choices, weak experimental designs, poor statistical strength, and often focus on outcomes from a single event. These negative attributes make them difficult to learn from. We provide practical recommendations that aim to improve the performance, scientific robustness, and defensibility of environmental flow monitoring programs. We draw on the literature and knowledge gained from working with stakeholders and managers to design, implement, and monitor a range of environmental flow types. We recommend that (1) environmental flow monitoring programs should be implemented within an adaptive management framework; (2) objectives of environmental flow programs should be well defined, attainable, and based on an agreed conceptual understanding of the system; (3) program and intervention targets should be attainable, measurable, and inform program objectives; (4) intervention monitoring programs should improve our understanding of flow-ecological responses and related conceptual models; (5) indicator selection should be based on conceptual models, objectives, and prioritization approaches; (6) appropriate monitoring designs and statistical tools should be used to measure and determine ecological response; (7) responses should be measured within timeframes that are relevant to the indicator(s); (8) watering events should be treated as replicates of a larger experiment; (9) environmental flow outcomes should be reported using a standard suite of metadata. Incorporating these attributes into future monitoring programs should ensure their outcomes are transferable and measured with high scientific credibility.
引用
收藏
页码:991 / 1005
页数:14
相关论文
共 403 条
  • [1] Acreman M(2004)Defining environmental river flow requirements—a review Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 8 861-876
  • [2] Dunbar MJ(2007)Ecological success in stream restoration: case studies from the midwestern United States Environ Manage 40 245-255
  • [3] Alexander GG(2001)The need to get the basics right in wildlife field studies Wildl Soc Bull 29 1294-1297
  • [4] Allen JD(2012)When can we ignore the problems of imperfect detection in comparative studies? Methods Ecol Evol 3 188-194
  • [5] Anderson DR(2006)The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems Ecol Appl 16 1311-1318
  • [6] Archaux F(2010)Preserving the biodiversity and ecological services of rivers: new challenges and research opportunities Freshwater Biol 55 1-16
  • [7] Henry P(2006)Fish assemblages of an Australian dryland river: abundance, assemblage structure and recruitment patterns in the Warrego River, Murray-Darling Basin Mar Freshw Res 57 619-633
  • [8] Gimenez O(2012)Fish body condition and recruitment success reflect antecedent flows in an Australian dryland river Fish Sci 78 841-847
  • [9] Arthington AH(2010)Associations between the plant communities of floodplain wetlands, water regime and wetland type River Res Appl 26 866-876
  • [10] Bunn SE(2002)Identifying the weakest link: simulating adaptive management of the re-introduction of a threatened fish Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59 1-8