No Evidence of Copy Number Variation in Acidic Mammalian Chitinase Genes (CHIA) in New World and Old World Monkeys

被引:0
作者
Mareike C. Janiak
机构
[1] Rutgers University,Department of Anthropology
来源
International Journal of Primatology | 2018年 / 39卷
关键词
AMCase; Digestive enzymes; Insectivory;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Copy number variation may be the most common form of structural genetic variation in the genome. Numerous studies have shown that gene copy number variation can correlate with phenotypic variation, where higher copy numbers correspond to increased expression of the protein and vice versa. Examples include some digestive enzyme genes, where variation in copy numbers and protein expression may be related to dietary differences. Increasing the expression of a digestive enzyme through higher gene copy numbers may thus be a potential mechanism for altering an organism’s digestive capabilities. I investigated copy number variation in genes coding for acidic mammalian chitinase, a chitinolytic digestive enzyme that may be used for the digestion of insect exoskeletons, in nonhuman primates with varying levels of insect consumption. I hypothesized that CHIA copy number correlates positively with level of insectivory, predicting higher copy numbers in more insectivorous primates. I assessed copy number variation with the QuantStudio 3D digital PCR platform, in a comparative sample of Old World and New World primate species (N = 10 species, one or two individuals each). Contrary to my prediction, no evidence of copy number variation was found and all species tested had two gene copies per diploid genome. These findings suggest that if acidic mammalian chitinase expression varies according to insect consumption in primates, it may be up- or downregulated through another mechanism.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 284
页数:15
相关论文
共 892 条
[1]  
Alonso C(1989)Ecologia e comportamento de Revista Nordestina de Biologia 6 105-137
[2]  
Langguth A(2013) (Primates: Callitrichidae) numa ilha de floresta Atlântica Nature 495 360-364
[3]  
Axelsson E(2013)The genomic signature of dog domestication reveals adaptation to a starch-rich diet PLoS One 8 86-93
[4]  
Ratnakumar A(1971)Measurements of salivary alpha amylase and salivary cortisol in hominoid primates reveal within-species consistency and between-species differences Scientific American 225 778-790
[5]  
Arendt M-L(2012)A grazing ecosystem in the Serengeti Genome Research 22 6770-6778
[6]  
Maqbool K(2001)Copy number variation of individual cattle genomes using next-generation sequencing Journal of Biological Chemistry 276 1283-1292
[7]  
Webster MT(2005)Identification of a novel acidic mammalian chitinase distinct from chitotriosidase Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry 53 187-195
[8]  
Perloski M(1990)Marked differences in tissue-specific expression of chitinases in mouse and man Folia Primatologica 54 685-697
[9]  
Liberg O(2013)Dietary variability in Journal of Comparative Physiology B: Biochemical, Systemic, and Environmental Physiology 183 1-259
[10]  
Arnemo JM(1986) in extreme habitats: Evidence for adaptability Contributions to Primatology 21 1-13