Return to theatre in secondary post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage: a comparison of coblation and dissection techniques

被引:0
作者
Ida Amir
Antonio Belloso
Stephen J. Broomfield
Pradeep Morar
机构
[1] Royal Blackburn Hospital,ENT Department
来源
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | 2012年 / 269卷
关键词
Tonsillectomy; Postoperative complications; Haemorrhage;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study is to examine the incidence of return to theatre (RTT) for post-operative haemorrhage following coblation and dissection tonsillectomy and to investigate those that required RTT more than 10 days post-surgery. Retrospective review of post-tonsillectomy haemorrhages requiring RTT from April 2005 to March 2009 was conducted. Of 2,541 tonsillectomies performed, 81% were by coblation and 19% by dissection methods. The overall RTT rate was 1.7%. No difference was found in the overall RTT rates for primary and secondary haemorrhage between the two techniques. However, the overall RTT rates for primary and secondary haemorrhage were higher in adults than children (P = 0.0456 and P = 0.0215, respectively). RTT for secondary haemorrhage during the first ten post-operative days occurred in both coblation and dissection tonsillectomy with no significant difference. After the first post-operative week, late secondary bleeding requiring RTT occurred only in the coblation group (P = 0.0676). Four patients required blood transfusion; all were in the coblation group, three of which were required during RTT in the late secondary haemorrhage (after 10 days). The post-operative RTT rates for coblation tonsillectomy did not reveal a change of trend over the 4-year study period. Our RTT rate for secondary haemorrhage is higher than earlier published results. A learning curve could not be identified in RTT for coblation tonsillectomy haemorrhage. Late secondary haemorrhages requiring surgical intervention have only been identified in cases performed by coblation and could potentially be life threatening as 33% (3/9) required blood transfusion. This phenomenon may be explained by a particular physiological healing process associated with coblation.
引用
收藏
页码:667 / 671
页数:4
相关论文
共 57 条
[11]  
Kukreja R(2008)Coblation tonsillectomy: a prospective, double-blind, randomised, clinical and histopathological comparison with dissection-ligation, monopolar electrocautery and laser tonsillectomies J Laryngol Otol 122 282-1210
[12]  
Ford GR(1990)Physics of thermal processes in laser-tissue interaction Phys Med Biol 35 1175-868
[13]  
Divi V(2000)Bipolar Coagulation with small diameter forceps in animal models for in utero cord obliteration Hum Reprod 15 865-49
[14]  
Benninger M(2009)Novel tonsillectomy technique Ugeskr Laeger 171 45-221
[15]  
Schrock A(2001)Comparison of monopolar electrosurgery to a new multipolar electrosurgical system in a rat model Laryngoscope 111 213-363
[16]  
Send T(2009)Wound healing in the rabbit paranasal sinuses after coblation: evaluation for use in endoscopic sinus surgery Am J Rhinol Allergy 23 360-466
[17]  
Heukamp L(2010)Wound healing in the paranasal sinuses after coblation, part II: evaluation for endoscopic sinus surgery using a sheep model Am J Rhinol Allergy 24 464-1309
[18]  
Gerstner AO(2006)Coblation versus unipolar electrocautery tonsillectomy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study in adult patient Laryngoscope 116 1303-undefined
[19]  
Bootz F(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[20]  
Jakob M(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined