The creation of inclusive governance infrastructures through participatory agenda-setting

被引:0
作者
Margaret M. Hinrichs
Erik W. Johnston
机构
[1] Arizona State University,
来源
European Journal of Futures Research | 2020年 / 8卷
关键词
Governance infrastructures; Boundary organizations; Participatory modeling;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Though a stronger orientation of research and innovation with a focus on societal needs, demands, and preferences has recently become the main argument under the header of responsible research and innovation, the processes by which community members are included in studies of the future, as well as forward-looking science, technology, and innovation are underexplored. This paper explores the role of participatory agenda-setting in creating governance infrastructures that reflect community participation, boundary object creation, and experimental innovation for increased understanding of future decision tradeoffs. Drawing upon the authors’ leadership and participant observation of two participatory agenda-setting projects, this paper contributes to our understanding of what participatory agenda-setting looks like in practice at a boundary organization in higher education. Though not a traditional research study with control and experiment groups, we seek to share our insights and lessons learned from our leadership of two projects with inherent participatory agenda-setting components. The paper culminates in recommendations for future projects which seek to incorporate laypeople into future-oriented research.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 81 条
  • [1] Allen D(2009)From boundary concept to boundary object: the practice and politics of care pathway development Soc Sci Med 69 354-361
  • [2] Arnstein SR(1969)A ladder of citizen participation J Am Inst Plann 35 216-224
  • [3] Bizer C(2012)The meaningful use of big data: four perspectives—four challenges ACM SIGMOD Rec 40 56-60
  • [4] Boncz P(2009)Crowdsourcing the public participation process for planning projects Plan Theory 8 242-262
  • [5] Brodie ML(2011)The cabals of a few or the confusion of a multitude: the institutional trade-off between representation and governance Am Econ J Econ Pol 3 1-24
  • [6] Erling O(2001)“In order to aid in diffusing useful and practical information”: agricultural extension and boundary organizations Sci Technol Hum Values 26 431-453
  • [7] Brabham DC(2011)Network determinants of knowledge utilization: preliminary lessons from a boundary organization Forensic Sci Commun 33 448-471
  • [8] Brooks L(2000)The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations Res Policy 29 109-123
  • [9] Phillips J(2001)Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: an introduction Sci Technol Hum Values 26 399-408
  • [10] Sinitsyn M(2014)Developing public policy to advance the use of big data in health care Health Aff 33 1523-1530